The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Engineered mycelium composite construction materials from fungal biorefineries: A critical review
Open accessAbstract
Mycelium composites are an emerging class of cheap and environmentally sustainable materials experiencing increasing research interest and commercialisation in the EU and USA for construction applications. These materials utilise natural fungal growth as a low energy bio-fabrication method to upcycle abundant agricultural by-products and wastes into more sustainable alternatives to energy intensive synthetic construction materials. Mycelium composites have customisable material properties based on their composition and manufacturing process and can replace foams, timber and plastics for applications, such as insulation, door cores, panelling, flooring, cabinetry and other furnishings. Due to their low thermal conductivity, high acoustic absorption and fire safety properties outperforming traditional construction materials, such as synthetic foams and engineered woods, they show particular promise as thermal and acoustic insulation foams. However, limitations stemming from their typically foam-like mechanical properties, high water absorption and many gaps in material property documentation necessitate the use of mycelium composites as non- or semi-structural supplements to traditional construction materials for specific, suitable applications, including insulation, panelling and furnishings. Nonetheless, useful material properties in addition to the low costs, simplicity of manufacture and environmental sustainability of these materials suggest that they will play a significant role in the future of green construction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis
Yang, H., Yan, R., Chen, H., Lee, D. H., & Zheng, C. (2007) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.013 · Cited by 8,155
Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article
Sartori, I., & Hestnes, A. G. (2007) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.07.001 · Cited by 1,284
Application of agro-waste for sustainable construction materials: A review
Madurwar, M. V., Ralegaonkar, R. V., & Mandavgane, S. A. (2013) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.09.011 · Cited by 584
Mycelium composites: a review of engineering characteristics and growth kinetics
Jones, M., Huynh, T., Dekiwadia, C., Daver, F., & John, S. (2017) · Journal of Bionanoscience · doi:10.1166/jbns.2017.1440 · Cited by 270
Self-citation
Cited by
Becoming Sustainable, The New Frontier in Soft Robotics
Hartmann, F., Baumgartner, M., & Kaltenbrunner, M. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202004413 · Cited by 281
Leather-like material biofabrication using fungi
Jones, M., Gandia, A., John, S., & Bismarck, A. (2020) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-020-00606-1 · Cited by 259
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, M., Mautner, A., Luenco, S., Bismarck, A., & John, S.
- Venue
- Materials & Design
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 187
- Pages
- 108397
- ISSN
- 0264-1275 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2992207241
- Cited by
- 591
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 15.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Engineered mycelium composite construction materials from fungal biorefineries: A critical review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108397
- The paper
- Jones, M., Mautner, A., Luenco, S., Bismarck, A., & John, S. (2020). Engineered mycelium composite construction materials from fungal biorefineries: A critical review. Materials & Design. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108397
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.