Cited by 9Polymer Nanocomposites and PropertiesPolymer Science and ApplicationsClay minerals and soil interactions

A simplified processing technique of organic–inorganic intercalation/exfoliation nanohybrid

Qiao, Yu, Chen, Jin, Han, Aijie, Deliwala, Jigar K.·2007·Materials Research Bulletin

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.materresbull.2006.10.005

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The flexural strength ranging between 30-40 MPa was achieved, comparable to typical steel-reinforced concrete.

    “The flexural strength ranging between 30-40 MPa was achieved, comparable to typical steel-reinforced concrete [367].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Qiao, Y., Chen, J., Han, A., & Deliwala, J. K.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of Akron (US)
Corresponding author
Qiao, Yu
Venue
Materials Research Bulletin
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-07
Volume
42
Issue
7
Pages
1332-1336
ISSN
0025-5408 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992810618
Cited by
9
References
11
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Materials Research Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Polymer Science and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Clay minerals and soil interactions
Keywords
organic-inorganic nanohybrids, polyamide 6, tensile strength, nanocomposite processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review