Cited by 10Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsClinical practice guidelines implementationDelphi Technique in Research

The systematic review of systematic reviews has arrived!

Moore, Ann, Jull, Gwen·2006·Manual Therapy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.math.2006.04.001

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moore, A., & Jull, G.
Affiliations
University of Brighton (GB)
Corresponding author
Moore, Ann
Venue
Manual Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-05
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
91-92
ISSN
1356-689X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977291558
Cited by
10
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2014: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Manual Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
Keywords
systematic reviews, umbrella review, evidence synthesis
MeSH terms
United Kingdom, Humans, Review Literature as Topic, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Peer Review, Research, Evidence-Based Medicine, Musculoskeletal Manipulations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review