Cited by 14Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and IrradiationNanomaterials and Printing TechnologiesConducting polymers and applications

Structural characterization and DC conductivity of honeycomb-patterned poly(ε-caprolactone)/gold nanoparticle-reduced graphite oxide composite films

Kim, Won Jung, Basavaraja, C., Thinh, P.X., Huh, Do Sung·2013·Materials Letters

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.matlet.2012.09.007

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, W. J., Basavaraja, C., Thinh, P. X., & Huh, D. S.
Affiliations
Inje University (KR)
Corresponding author
Huh, Do Sung
Venue
Materials Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
90
Pages
14-18
ISSN
0167-577X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046841833
Cited by
14
References
18
Citations by year
2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Materials Letters (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Research Foundation of Korea
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Conducting polymers and applications
Keywords
polycaprolactone, gold nanoparticles, reduced graphite oxide, polymer nanocomposite films, honeycomb pattern, DC conductivity, biocompatible composites, thin film patterning, nanoparticle concentration effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review