Cited by 21Natural Fiber Reinforced CompositesPolymer Foaming and CompositesAdvanced Cellulose Research Studies

Influence of cellulose fibers extracted from pineapple (Ananas comosus) leaf to the mechanical properties of rigid polyurethane foam

Jabber, Lady Jaharah Y., Grumo, Jessalyn C., Alguno, Arnold C., Lubguban, Arnold A., Capangpangan, Rey Y.·2021·Materials Today: Proceedings

Abstract

Abstract The influence of cellulose fibers extracted from pineapple (Ananas comosus) leaf fibers on polyurethane foam’s mechanical properties (PUF) is reported. The PUFs were reinforced with different weight ratios (1, 3, and 5 wt%) of cellulose fibers. The surface morphology of the extracted cellulose fibers was determined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The functional groups and vibrational modes of the reinforced PUFs were measured using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The influence of cellulose fibers to the density and mechanical property of the PUFs were also investigated using universal testing Machine (UTM). Experimental results showed the absence of hemicellulose, lignin, and other soluble materials present in the pineapple leaves after alkaline treatment, suggesting high-quality cellulose fibers. Likewise, FTIR spectra revealed the presence of typical urethane linkages of PUFs suggesting the successful formation of PUFs with a varied amount of cellulose fibers. The mechanical properties of the PUFs with an increasing amount of cellulose fibers exhibit a decrease of the compressive strength of the fabricated PUFs may be due to the lack of cross-linking between the cellulose fibers and PUFs that will influence the reactivity in the system that eventually affects the polyurethane foam density expansion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.566

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Asim, 2015, Int. J. Polym. Sci.
  2. Wiyono, 2016, ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci., 11, 14398
  3. Akindoyo, 2016, Royal Soc. Chem., 6, 114453
  4. Li, 2019, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 48307
  5. Demiroglu, 2017, Gazi Univ. J. Sci., 30, 97
  6. Cru-Lopes, 2016, Int. J. Chem. Mol. Nucl. Mater. Metall. Eng., 10
  7. Adam, 2016, J. Eng. Appl. Sci., 11, 161
  8. Leng, 2019, Forest, 10, 200
  9. de Avila Delucis, 2017, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 45684

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jabber, L. J. Y., Grumo, J. C., Alguno, A. C., Lubguban, A. A., & Capangpangan, R. Y.
Affiliations
  • Mindanao State University – Iligan Institute of Technology (PH)
  • Caraga State University (PH)
Corresponding author
Jabber, Lady Jaharah Y.
Venue
Materials Today: Proceedings
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021
Volume
46
Pages
1735-1739
ISSN
2214-7853 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3082439459
Cited by
21
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Materials Today Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Funders
Department of Science and Technology, Republic of the Philippines
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer Foaming and Composites
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
Keywords
pineapple, rigid polyurethane foam, natural fiber reinforcement, mechanical properties, compressive strength, alkaline extraction, fiber surface morphology, urethane linkage, foam density, crosslinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review