Cited by 31Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterialsEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies

Nanomaterials usage as adsorbents for the pollutants removal from wastewater; a review

Naser, Juman A., Ahmed, Zainab W., Ali, Enas H.·2021·Materials Today: Proceedings

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.584

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Naser, J. A., Ahmed, Z. W., & Ali, E. H.
Affiliations
University of Baghdad (IQ)
Corresponding author
Naser, Juman A.
Venue
Materials Today: Proceedings
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021
Volume
42
Pages
2590-2595
ISSN
2214-7853 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3134125710
Cited by
31
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Materials Today Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
Keywords
nanoadsorbents, wastewater treatment, adsorption, isotherm models, adsorption kinetics, carbon nanomaterials, metal nanoparticles, metal oxide nanoparticles, polymer nanofibers, polymer nanocomposites, pollutant removal, organic and inorganic pollutants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review