Cited by 47Bone Tissue Engineering MaterialsTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineBone health and osteoporosis research

Biomaterials for tissue engineered bone Scaffolds: A review

Kalsi, Sachin, Singh, Jagjit, Sehgal, S.S., Sharma, N.K.·2023·Materials Today: Proceedings

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.273

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kalsi, S., Singh, J., Sehgal, S. S., & Sharma, N. K.
Affiliations
  • Chandigarh University (IN)
  • University of Saskatchewan (CA)
Corresponding author
Kalsi, Sachin
Venue
Materials Today: Proceedings
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023
Volume
81
Pages
888-893
ISSN
2214-7853 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3159637907
Cited by
47
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Materials Today Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
Keywords
bone tissue engineering, bone scaffolds, biomaterials, bone grafting, bone defects, extracellular matrix, scaffold fabrication, scaffold degradation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review