Cited by 33Academic Writing and PublishingPublishing and Scholarly CommunicationAcademic Publishing and Open Access

Tips on How to Write ‘Good’

Open access
Cranford, Steven W.·2020·Matter

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.matt.2019.12.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Not being able to identify individual molecules results in loss of randomness when analyzing stochastic chemical processes, which is why chemical reactions cannot typically be used as RNGs.

    “Although this is a promising approach, not being able to identify individual molecules results in the loss of randomness when analyzing stochastic chemical processes, which is why chemical reactions cannot typically be used as RNGs15.”

    From DNA synthesis for true random number generation (2020) · cites this paper as [15]

  • Although expectation of products can be statistically predicted, being able to identify individual molecules after synthesis is rarely possible.

    “Although the expectation of products can be statistically predicted, being able to identify individual molecules after synthesis is rarely possible15.”

    From DNA synthesis for true random number generation (2020) · cites this paper as [15]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cranford, S. W.
Corresponding author
Cranford, Steven W.
Venue
Matter
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
1-3
ISSN
2590-2385 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3000084355
Cited by
33
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 1
FWCI
27.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Matter (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
Keywords
career change, editorial career, scholarly publishing, writing skills, self-reflection, career choice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review