The DOI matches its Crossref record; 111 of the 111 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding electrochemical potentials of cathode materials in rechargeable batteries
Open accessAbstract
Presently, sustainable energy as well as efficient and economical energy conversion and storage technologies has become important work in light of the rising environmental issues and dependence on portable and uninterrupted power sources. Increasingly more researchers are focusing on harvesting and converting solar energy, mechanical vibration, waste heat, and wind to electricity. Electrical energy storage technologies play a significant role in the demand for green and sustainable energy. Rechargeable batteries or secondary batteries, such as Li-ion batteries, Na-ion batteries, and Mg-ion batteries, reversibly convert between electrical and chemical energy via redox reactions, thus storing the energy as chemical potential in their electrodes. The energy density of a rechargeable battery is determined collectively by the specific capacity of electrodes and the working voltage of the cell, which is the differential potential between the cathode and the anode. Over the past decades, a significant number of studies have focused on enhancing this specific capacity; however, studies to understand and manipulate the electrochemical potential of the electrode materials are limited. In this review, the material characteristics that determine and influence the electrochemical potentials of electrodes are discussed. In particular, the cathode materials that convert electricity and chemical potential through electrochemical intercalation reactions are investigated. In addition, we summarize the selection criteria for elements or compounds and the effect of the local atomic environment on the discharge potential, including the effects of site energy, defects, crystallinity, and microstructure, using LiMn 2 O 4 , V 2 O 5 , Mo 6 S 8 , LiFePO 4 , and LiCoO 2 as model samples for discussion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries
Tarascon, J.-M., & Armand, M. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35104644 · Cited by 21,130
Armand, M., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/451652a · Cited by 19,612
Materials for electrochemical capacitors
Simon, P., & Gogotsi, Y. (2008) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat2297 · Cited by 16,427
Challenges for Rechargeable Li Batteries
Goodenough, J. B., & Kim, Y. (2010) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm901452z · Cited by 10,943
The Li-Ion Rechargeable Battery: A Perspective
Goodenough, J. B., & Park, K.-S. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja3091438 · Cited by 9,962
Nanostructured materials for advanced energy conversion and storage devices
Aricò, A. S., Bruce, P., Scrosati, B., Tarascon, J.-M., & van Schalkwijk, W. (2005) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat1368 · Cited by 8,826
Towards greener and more sustainable batteries for electrical energy storage
Larcher, D., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2015) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.2085 · Cited by 7,872
What are batteries, fuel cells, and supercapacitors?
Winter, M., & Brodd, R. J. (2004) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr020730k · Cited by 7,389
Li-ion battery materials: present and future
Nitta, N., Wu, F., Lee, J. T., & Yushin, G. (2015) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2014.10.040 · Cited by 7,389
Research Development on Sodium-Ion Batteries
Yabuuchi, N., Kubota, K., Dahbi, M., & Komaba, S. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500192f · Cited by 6,478
Cited by
Towards establishing standard performance metrics for batteries, supercapacitors and beyond
Noori, A., El-Kady, M. F., Rahmanifar, M. S., Kaner, R. B., & Mousavi, M. F. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00581h · Cited by 1,303
Electrochemical potential window of battery electrolytes: the HOMO–LUMO misconception
Peljo, P., & Girault, H. H. (2018) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c8ee01286e · Cited by 708
A review of current collectors for lithium-ion batteries
Zhu, P., Gastol, D., Marshall, J., Sommerville, R., Goodship, V., & Kendrick, E. (2021) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229321 · Cited by 523
Rational Design of Nanostructured Functional Interlayer/Separator for Advanced Li–S Batteries
Jeong, Y. C., Kim, J. H., Nam, S., Park, C. R., & Yang, S. J. (2018) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201707411 · Cited by 429
Martins, L. S., Guimarães, L. F., Botelho Junior, A. B., Tenório, J. A. S., & Espinosa, D. C. R. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113091 · Cited by 361
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, C., Neale, Z. G., & Cao, G.
- Venue
- Materials Today
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-03
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 109-123
- ISSN
- 1369-7021 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2178611116
- Cited by
- 1,156
- References
- 111
- FWCI
- 27.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding electrochemical potentials of cathode materials in rechargeable batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.mattod.2015.10.009
- The paper
- Liu, C., Neale, Z. G., & Cao, G. (2016). Understanding electrochemical potentials of cathode materials in rechargeable batteries. Materials Today. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2015.10.009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.