The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High-rate lithium cycling in a scalable trilayer Li-garnet-electrolyte architecture
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Solid-state lithium batteries promise to exceed the capabilities of traditional Li-ion batteries in safety and performance. However, a number of obstacles have stood in the path of solid-state battery development, primarily high resistance and low capacity. In this work, these barriers are overcome through the fabrication of a uniquely microstructured solid electrolyte architecture based on a doped Li7La3Zr2O12 (LLZ) ceramic Li-conductor. Specifically, a porous-dense-porous trilayer structure was fabricated by tape casting, a scalable roll-to-roll manufacturing technique. The dense (>99%) center layer can be fabricated as thin as ∼10 μm and blocks dendrites over hundreds of cycles. The microstructured porous layers serve as electrode supports and increase the mechanical strength by ∼9×, making the cells strong enough to handle with ease. Additionally, the porous layers multiply the electrode–electrolyte interfacial surface area by >40× compared to a typical planar interface. Lithium symmetric cells based on the trilayer architecture were cycled at room temperature and achieved area-specific resistances (∼7 Ω-cm2) dramatically lower, and current densities dramatically higher (10 mA/cm2), than previously reported literature results. Moreover, to demonstrate scalability a large-format cell was fabricated with lithium metal in one porous layer and a sulfur electrode with conductive carbon and an ionic liquid interface in the other, achieving 1244 mAh/g S utilization and 195 Wh/kg based on total cell mass, showing a promising path to commercially viable, intrinsically safe lithium batteries with high specific energy and high energy density.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electrolytes and Interphases in Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond
Xu, K. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500003w · Cited by 5,566
Rapidly falling costs of battery packs for electric vehicles
Nykvist, B., & Nilsson, M. (2015) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2564 · Cited by 1,819
Cited by
Physicochemical Concepts of the Lithium Metal Anode in Solid-State Batteries
Krauskopf, T., Richter, F. H., Zeier, W. G., & Janek, J. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00431 · Cited by 892
Han, Y., Liu, B., Xiao, Z., Zhang, W., Wang, X., Pan, G., Xia, Y., Xia, X., & Tu, J. (2021) · InfoMat · doi:10.1002/inf2.12166 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Hitz, G. T., McOwen, D. W., Zhang, L., Ma, Z., Fu, Z., Wen, Y., Gong, Y., Dai, J., Hamann, T. R., Hu, L., & Wachsman, E. D.
- Venue
- Materials Today
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 22
- Pages
- 50-57
- ISSN
- 1369-7021 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2806226852
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-rate lithium cycling in a scalable trilayer Li-garnet-electrolyte architecture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.mattod.2018.04.004
- The paper
- Hitz, G. T., McOwen, D. W., Zhang, L., Ma, Z., Fu, Z., Wen, Y., Gong, Y., Dai, J., Hamann, T. R., Hu, L., & Wachsman, E. D. (2019). High-rate lithium cycling in a scalable trilayer Li-garnet-electrolyte architecture. Materials Today. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2018.04.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.