Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,062

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hard carbons for sodium-ion batteries: Structure, analysis, sustainability, and electrochemistry

Open access
Dou, Xinwei, Hasa, Ivana, Saurel, Damien, Vaalma, Christoph, Wu, Liming, Buchholz, Daniel, Bresser, Dominic, Komaba, Shinichi, Passerini, Stefano·2019·Materials Today

Abstract

Abstract Hard carbons are extensively studied for application as anode materials in sodium-ion batteries, but only recently a great interest has been focused toward the understanding of the sodium storage mechanism and the comprehension of the structure–function correlation. Although several interesting mechanisms have been proposed, a general mechanism explaining the observed electrochemical processes is still missing, which is essentially originating from the remaining uncertainty on the complex hard carbons structure. The achievement of an in-depth understanding of the processes occurring upon sodiation, however, is of great importance for a rational design of optimized anode materials. In this review, we aim at providing a comprehensive overview of the up-to-date known structural models of hard carbons and their correlation with the proposed models for the sodium-ion storage mechanisms. In this regard, a particular focus is set on the most powerful analytical tools to study the structure of hard carbons (upon de-/sodiation) and a critical discussion on how to interpret and perform such analysis. Targeting the eventual commercialization of hard carbon anodes for sodium-ion batteries – after having established a fundamental understanding – we close this review with a careful evaluation of potential strategies to ensure a high degree of sustainability, since this is undoubtedly a crucial parameter to take into account for the future large-scale production of hard carbons.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mattod.2018.12.040

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 1,062

Metadata

Authors
Dou, X., Hasa, I., Saurel, D., Vaalma, C., Wu, L., Buchholz, D., Bresser, D., Komaba, S., & Passerini, S.
Venue
Materials Today
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
23
Pages
87-104
ISSN
1369-7021 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2909833871
Cited by
1,062
References
5
FWCI
33.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hard carbons for sodium-ion batteries: Structure, analysis, sustainability, and electrochemistry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.mattod.2018.12.040
The paper
Dou, X., Hasa, I., Saurel, D., Vaalma, C., Wu, L., Buchholz, D., Bresser, D., Komaba, S., & Passerini, S. (2019). Hard carbons for sodium-ion batteries: Structure, analysis, sustainability, and electrochemistry. Materials Today. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2018.12.040

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.