Mammographic density using two computer-based methods in an isoflavone trial
Abstract
Objectives Mammographic density is a useful biomarker of breast cancer risk. Computer-based methods can provide continuous data suitable for analysis. This study aimed to compare a semi-automated computer-assisted method (Cumulus) and a fully automated volumetric computer method (standard mammogram form (SMF)) for assessing mammographic density using data from a previously conducted randomised placebo-controlled trial of an isoflavone supplement. Methods Mammograms were obtained from participants in the intervention study. A total of 177 women completed the study. Baseline and follow-up mammograms were digitised and density was estimated using Cumulus (read by two readers) and SMF. Left-right correlation, changes in density over time, and difference between intervention and control groups were evaluated. Changes of density over time, and changes between intervention group and control group were examined using paired t-test and Student's t-test, respectively. Results Inter-reader correlation coefficient by Cumulus was 0.90 for dense area, and 0.86 for percentage density. Left-right correlation of percent density was lower in SMF than in Cumulus. Among all women, percentage density by Cumulus decreased significantly over time, but no change was seen for SMF percentage density. The intervention group showed marginally significant greater reduction of percent density by Cumulus compared to controls (p=0.04), but the difference became weak after adjustment for baseline percent den…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
None of the RCTs assessing endometrial thickness, mammographic density or changes, nipple aspirate volume, PAP results and uterine fibroid growth, or vaginal cytology found any evidence of negative impact from soy compared to control.
“None of the studies assessing endometrial thickness [132,136,155], mammographic density or mammographic changes [66,132,136,137,144,146], nipple aspirate volume [134], PAP results and uterine fibroid growth [132], or vaginal cytology [155] found any evidence of negative impact from soy compared to the control group.”
From Soy, Red Clover, and Isoflavones and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review (2013) · cites this paper as [137]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Soy, Red Clover, and Isoflavones and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
Fritz, H., Seely, D., Flower, G., Skidmore, B., Fernandes, R., Vadeboncoeur, S., Kennedy, D., Cooley, K., Wong, R., Sagar, S., et al. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081968 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kataoka, M., Atkinson, C., Warren, R., Sala, E., Day, N. E., Highnam, R., Warsi, I., & Bingham, S. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- University Of Bristol Dental Hospital (GB)
- Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
- MRC Mitochondrial Biology Unit (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Kataoka, Masako
- Venue
- Maturitas
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 350-357
- ISSN
- 0378-5122 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2116538637
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 1.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Maturitas (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Food Standards Agency
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
- Keywords
- breast density, breast cancer risk biomarkers, interobserver agreement
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Breast, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Isoflavones, Mammography, Middle Aged, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review