Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 189

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence of and factors associated with frailty and disability in older adults from China, Ghana, India, Mexico, Russia and South Africa

Open access
Biritwum, R.B., Minicuci, N., Yawson, A.E., Theou, O., Mensah, G.P., Naidoo, N., Wu, F., Guo, Y., Zheng, Y., Jiang, Y., Maximova, T., Kalula, S., Arokiasamy, P., Salinas-Rodríguez, A., Manrique-Espinoza, B., Snodgrass, J.J., Sterner, K.N., Eick, G., Liebert, M.A., Schrock, J., Afshar, S., Thiele, E., Vollmer, S., Harttgen, K., Strulik, H., Byles, J.E., Rockwood, K., Mitnitski, A., Chatterji, S., Kowal, P.·2016·Maturitas

Abstract

BACKGROUND The severe burden imposed by frailty and disability in old age is a major challenge for healthcare systems in low- and middle-income countries alike. The current study aimed to provide estimates of the prevalence of frailty and disability in older adult populations and to examine their relationship with socioeconomic factors in six countries. METHODS Focusing on adults aged 50+ years, a frailty index was constructed as the proportion of deficits in 40 variables, and disability was assessed using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0), as part of the Study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE) Wave 1 in China, Ghana, India, Mexico, Russia and South Africa. RESULTS This study included a total of 34,123 respondents. China had the lowest percentages of older adults with frailty (13.1%) and with disability (69.6%), whereas India had the highest percentages (55.5% and 93.3%, respectively). Both frailty and disability increased with age for all countries, and were more frequent in women, although the sex gap varied across countries. Lower levels of both frailty and disability were observed at higher levels of education and wealth. Both education and income were protective factors for frailty and disability in China, India and Russia, whereas only income was protective in Mexico, and only education in South Africa. CONCLUSIONS Age-related frailty and disability are increasing concerns for older adult populations in low- and middle-income countries. The results indicate that lower levels of frailty and disability can be achieved for older people, and the study highlights the need for targeted preventive approaches and support programs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.05.012

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 189

Metadata

Authors
Biritwum, R. B., Minicuci, N., Yawson, A. E., Theou, O., Mensah, G. P., Naidoo, N., Wu, F., Guo, Y., Zheng, Y., Jiang, Y., Maximova, T., Kalula, S., Arokiasamy, P., Salinas-Rodríguez, A., Manrique-Espinoza, B., Snodgrass, J. J., Sterner, K. N., Eick, G., Liebert, M. A., Schrock, J., Afshar, S., Thiele, E., Vollmer, S., Harttgen, K., Strulik, H., Byles, J. E., Rockwood, K., Mitnitski, A., Chatterji, S., & Kowal, P.
Venue
Maturitas
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
91
Pages
8-18
ISSN
0378-5122 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2402726100
Cited by
189
References
7
FWCI
6.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.