Cited by 48Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationHealthcare Systems and TechnologyPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Successful Implementation of a Telemedicine-Based Counseling Program for High-Risk Patients With Breast Cancer

Pruthi, Sandhya, Stange, Kevin J., Malagrino, Gerald D., Chawla, Kashmira S., LaRusso, Nicholas F., Kaur, Judith S.·2013·Mayo Clinic Proceedings

Abstract

An interactive audio and video telemedicine feasibility program was established to provide counseling on breast cancer risk-reducing strategies for underserved, high-risk Alaskan native women through a collaboration among the Alaska Native Medical Center, the Mayo Clinic Breast Clinic, Mayo's Center for Innovation, and the Alaska Federal Health Care Access Network. The telemedicine model included a navigator to facilitate patient encounters (referrals, electronic records, and scheduling) and a subscription billing contract. Between January 1 and December 31, 2011, 60 consultations were provided to the Alaska Native Medical Center. A survey of a sample of 15 women demonstrated overall patient satisfaction of 98% pertaining to the experience, technology, and medical consultation. The referring physician satisfaction, from 11 visit surveys and 8 referring physicians, revealed 99% satisfaction with the service. In this telemedicine pilot study, we demonstrated the feasibility of a telemedicine program to provide integrated specialty care that resulted in a positive effect on patient satisfaction. This program has a sustainable business model, thus creating a new modality for health care delivery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.10.015

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pruthi, S., Stange, K. J., Malagrino, G. D., Chawla, K. S., LaRusso, N. F., & Kaur, J. S.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Alaska Native Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Pruthi, Sandhya
Venue
Mayo Clinic Proceedings
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
88
Issue
1
Pages
68-73
ISSN
0025-6196 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964802095
Cited by
48
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Mayo Clinic Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research
  • National Cancer Institute (U01CA114609)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
telemedicine, breast cancer risk reduction, patient counseling, Alaska Native women, underserved populations, patient navigators, patient satisfaction, physician satisfaction, feasibility, models of care, breast cancer screening
MeSH terms
Adult, Alaska, Breast Neoplasms, Counseling, Female, Humans, Pilot Projects, Rural Population, Program Evaluation, Program Development, Patient Satisfaction, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review