Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 566

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Association Between Hypoxemia and Mortality in Patients With COVID-19

Open access
Xie, Jiang, Covassin, Naima, Fan, Zhengyang, Singh, Prachi, Gao, Wei, Li, Guangxi, Kara, Tomas, Somers, Virend K.·2020·Mayo Clinic Proceedings

Abstract

Objective To identify markers associated with in-hospital death in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)–associated pneumonia. Patients and Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted of 140 patients with moderate to critical COVID-19–associated pneumonia requiring oxygen supplementation admitted to the hospital from January 28, 2020, through February 28, 2020, and followed up through March 13, 2020, in Union Hospital, Wuhan, China. Oxygen saturation (SpO2) and other measures were tested as predictors of in-hospital mortality in survival analysis. Results Of 140 patients with COVID-19–associated pneumonia, 72 (51.4%) were men, with a median age of 60 years. Patients with SpO2 values of 90% or less were older and were more likely to be men, to have hypertension, and to present with dyspnea than those with SpO2 values greater than 90%. Overall, 36 patients (25.7%) died during hospitalization after median 14-day follow-up. Higher SpO2 levels after oxygen supplementation were associated with reduced mortality independently of age and sex (hazard ratio per 1-U SpO2, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.91 to 0.95; P<.001). The SpO2 cutoff value of 90.5% yielded 84.6% sensitivity and 97.2% specificity for prediction of survival. Dyspnea was also independently associated with death in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.24 to 5.43; P=.01). Conclusion In this cohort of patients with COVID-19, hypoxemia was independently associated with in-hospital mortality. These results may help guide the clinical management of patients with severe COVID-19, particularly in settings requiring strategic allocation of limited critical care resources. Trial Registration Chictr.org.cn Identifier: ChiCTR2000030852

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.04.006

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 566

Metadata

Authors
Xie, J., Covassin, N., Fan, Z., Singh, P., Gao, W., Li, G., Kara, T., & Somers, V. K.
Venue
Mayo Clinic Proceedings
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
95
Issue
6
Pages
1138-1147
ISSN
0025-6196 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3015759088
Cited by
566
References
2
FWCI
14.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association Between Hypoxemia and Mortality in Patients With COVID-19. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.04.006
The paper
Xie, J., Covassin, N., Fan, Z., Singh, P., Gao, W., Li, G., Kara, T., & Somers, V. K. (2020). Association Between Hypoxemia and Mortality in Patients With COVID-19. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.04.006

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.