Cited by 133Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyHealthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring

Disparities in Hypoxemia Detection by Pulse Oximetry Across Self-Identified Racial Groups and Associations with Clinical Outcomes

Open access
Henry, Nicole R., Hanson, Andrew C., Schulte, Phillip J., Warner, Nafisseh S., Manento, Megan N., Weister, Timothy J., Warner, Matthew A.·2022·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess disparities in hypoxemia detection by pulse oximetry across self-identified racial groups and associations with clinical outcomes. DESIGN: Observational cohort study from May 5, 2018, to December 31, 2020. SETTING: Three academic medical centers in the United States. PATIENTS: Adults greater than or equal to 18 years who self-identified as White, Black, Asian, or American Indian admitted to the ICU or undergoing surgery during inpatient hospitalization with simultaneous measurements of pulse oximetry-estimated oxygen saturation and arterial blood gas-derived oxygen saturation. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Multivariable models were employed to assess the relationships between race, occult hypoxemia (i.e., arterial blood gas-derived oxygen saturation < 88% despite pulse oximetry-estimated oxygen saturation ≥ 92%), and clinical outcomes of hospital mortality and hospital-free days. One-hundred twenty-eight-thousand two-hundred eighty-five paired pulse oximetry-estimated oxygen saturation-arterial blood gas-derived oxygen saturation measurements were included from 26,603 patients. Pulse oximetry-estimated oxygen saturation on average overestimated arterial blood gas-derived oxygen saturation by 1.57% (1.54-1.61%). Black, Asian, and American Indian patients were more likely to experience occult hypoxemia during hospitalization (estimated probability 6.2% [5.1-7.6%], 6.6% [4.9-8.8%], and 6.6% [4.4-10.0%], respectively) compared with White patients (3.6% [3.4-3.8%]). Black patients had increased odds of occult hypoxemia compared with White patients after adjustment (odds ratio, 1.65; 1.28-2.14; p < 0.001). Differences in occult hypoxemia between Asian and American Indian patients compared with White patients were not significant after adjustment (odds ratio, 1.53; 0.95-2.47; p = 0.077 and odds ratio, 1.31; 0.80-2.16; p = 0.288, respectively). Occult hypoxemia was associated with increased odds of mortality in surgical (odds ratio, 2.96; 1.20-7.28; p = 0.019) and ICU patients (1.36; 1.03-1.80; p = 0.033). Occult hypoxemia was associated with fewer hospital-free days in surgical (-2.5 d [-3.9 to -1.2 d]; p < 0.001) but not ICU patients (0.4 d [-0.7 to 1.4 d]; p = 0.500). CONCLUSIONS: Occult hypoxemia is more common in Black patients compared with White patients and is associated with increased mortality, suggesting potentially important outcome implications for undetected hypoxemia. It is imperative to validate pulse oximetry with expanded racial inclusion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ccm.0000000000005394

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent studies have shown a positive bias in oxygen saturation measurements in patients with darkly pigmented skin, particularly under low saturation conditions.

    “Recent studies have shown a positive bias in oxygen saturation measurements in patients with darkly pigmented skin, particularly under low saturation conditions.”
  • A prevalence of occult hypoxemia in dark-skinned subjects has been recently confirmed in three studies, showing that dark-skinned patients may have over three times the risk of experiencing occult hypoxemia during hospitalization compared to light-skinned patients.

    “A prevalence of occult hypoxemia in dark-skinned subjects has been recently confirmed in three studies, showing that dark-skinned patients may have over three times the risk of experiencing occult hypoxemia during hospitalization compared to light-skinned patients [53,54,55].”
  • More recent studies have revealed that dark skin pigmentation influences the accuracy and performance of pulse oximeter devices, resulting in overestimations, with increased incidence in the risk for occult hypoxemia (SO2<88% despite normal SpO2>92%).

    “More recent studies have also revealed that dark skin pigmentation influences the accuracy and performance of pulse oximeters devices, resulting in overestimations [17,49,50,51,52,53] with increased incidence in the risk for occult hypoxemia (SO2<88% despite normal SpO2>92%) [54,55].”
  • Ancestry descriptors were used in 11 studies (29.73%).

    “On the other hand, ancestry descriptors were used in 11 studies (29.73%) [17,21,23,24,41,51,53,61,75,82,93]”
  • Pulse oximetry performance in the dark-skinned population may lead to overestimations with increased incidence of occult hypoxemia and risk of negative health effects from diseases like COVID-19.

    “To sum up, we conclude that pulse oximetry performance in the dark-skinned population may lead to overestimations with increased incidence of occult hypoxemia and risk of negative health effects from diseases like COVID-19 [51,53,55].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [10]Valbuena VSM, Barbaro RP, Claar D, Racial Bias in Pulse Oximetry Measurement Among Patients About to Undergo ECMO in 2019–2020, A Retrospective Cohort Study. Chest. Published online September 27, 2021. doi: 10.1016/J.CHEST.2021.09.025 PMC9005857 34592317 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Henry, N. R., Hanson, A. C., Schulte, P. J., Warner, N. S., Manento, M. N., Weister, T. J., & Warner, M. A.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2022-02
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
204-211
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210319435
Cited by
133
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 15
FWCI
7.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (KL2TR002379)
  • National Institute on Aging (K23AG070113)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23HL153310)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000585)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
Keywords
pulse oximetry, racial disparities, oxygen saturation, arterial blood gases, Black patients, American Indian patients, Asian patients, in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay, intensive care unit patients, surgical patients, hypoxemia detection, hospital safety
MeSH terms
Academic Medical Centers, Aged, Hypoxia, Arizona, Female, Florida, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Minnesota, Oximetry, Oxygen, Skin Pigmentation, Cohort Studies, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Racial Groups, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review