Cited by 8Cellular Mechanics and InteractionsTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine3D Printing in Biomedical Research

Multimodal mechanoregulation strategies towards tissue regeneration

Open access
Yu, Qifan, Duan, Yudong, Zhu, Zhuang, Ji, Wei, Zhu, Caihong, Li, Bin·2025·Mechanobiology in Medicine

Abstract

Mechanical microenvironment of each tissue plays an important role in regulating its special cellular behaviors, such as morphology, proliferation, differentiation, and migration. Mechanical signals can direct lineage specification or promote cell migration towards injury sites and facilitate tissue repair. During tissue regeneration, mechanoregulation is also important due to the ability of providing an extracellular microenvironment that closely resembles the physiological state for cells. Currently, mechanoregulation strategies have been usually applied to promote tissue regeneration. However, the in vivo mechanical environment is highly complex, these single mechanical conditioning strategies cannot comprehensively replicate the mechanical microenvironment experienced by cells or tissues in the body, thereby hindering the achievement of efficient tissue regeneration. The proposal of multimodal mechanoregulation strategies offers promising avenues to address this limitation. Herein, we summarize the critical role of mechanical factors in promoting tissue regeneration and the current development of different multimodal mechanoregulation approaches. Furthermore, the complex mechanical microenvironment of various tissues such as bone, intervertebral disc and cardiac. Afterwards, the recent successful applications of multimodal mechanical strategies in regenerative therapies were reviewed. And we delineate the persisting challenges, potential resolutions, and emerging translational prospects for multimodal mechanoregulation strategies in regenerative medicine, providing a reference for further development of multimodal mechanoregulation approaches.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mbm.2025.100159

Cites

112 of 112 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An optimal biodegradable implant should degrade substantially only after fulfilling its mechanical role during fracture healing, necessitating a degradation rate that aligns with the bone healing process.

    “Actually, an optimal biodegradable implant should degrade substantially only after fulfilling its mechanical role during the fracture healing period, necessitating a degradation rate that aligns with the bone healing process42–44.”

    From Intelligence-responsive wettability switch coating on magnesium implants for treating osteoporotic fracture (2026) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Clinical translation section discusses degradation of a PLLA scaffold and its acidic byproducts, but not when a fracture-fixation implant should lose mechanical support. Searches for fracture healing, implant degradation rate, and mechanical support found no passage linking degradation timing to bone healing. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, Q., Duan, Y., Zhu, Z., Ji, W., Zhu, C., & Li, B.
Affiliations
Soochow University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zhu, Caihong
  • Li, Bin
Venue
Mechanobiology in Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-12
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
100159
ISSN
2949-9070 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4415614737
Cited by
8
References
112
Citations by year
2026: 8
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mechanobiology in Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (824B2075, U24A20670, 81925027, 32371414, 32130059)
  • Graduate Research and Innovation Projects of Jiangsu Province (KYCX25_3488)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Keywords
mechanoregulation, tissue regeneration, mechanical microenvironment, mechanobiology, bone regeneration, intervertebral disc regeneration, cardiac regeneration, cell migration, lineage specification, regenerative medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review