Cited by 64Evolution and Genetic DynamicsStochastic processes and statistical mechanicsMathematical Biology Tumor Growth

A generalized Luria–Delbrück model

Dewanji, A., Luebeck, E.G., Moolgavkar, S.H.·2005·Mathematical Biosciences

Abstract

We develop extensions of the Luria-Delbrück model that explicitly consider non-exponential growth of normal cells and a birth-death process with mean exponential or Gompertz growth of mutants. Death of mutant cells can be important in clones arising during cancer progression. The use of a birth-death process for growth of mutant cells, as opposed to a pure birth process as in previous work on the Luria-Delbrück model, leads to a large increase in the extra Poisson variation in the size of the mutant cell populations, which needs to be addressed in statistical analyses. We also discuss connections with previous work on carcinogenesis models.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mbs.2005.07.003

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Under the assumptions considered above, bacterial growth in the presence of a sub-inhibitory concentration of an antibiotic has, apart from increasing the number of cell divisions, the additional effect of decreasing the net growth rate of the non-mutant cells, leading to ρ* > 1 and thus further inflating mutant counts.

    “Under the assumptions considered above, bacterial growth in the presence of a sub-inhibitory concentration of an antibiotic has, apart from increasing the number of cell divisions, the additional effect of decreasing the net growth rate of the non-mutant cells, leading to ρ * > 1 and thus further inflating mutant counts.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dewanji, A., Luebeck, E. G., & Moolgavkar, S. H.
Affiliations
  • Indian Statistical Institute (IN)
  • Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Moolgavkar, S.H.
Venue
Mathematical Biosciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-10
Volume
197
Issue
2
Pages
140-152
ISSN
0025-5564 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966001093
Cited by
64
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Mathematical Biosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA047658)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
Keywords
tumor progression, birth-death processes, Gompertz growth, carcinogenesis models, clonal evolution
MeSH terms
Models, Biological, Mutation, Stochastic Processes, Cell Growth Processes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review