Cited by 1,713Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsCancer Genomics and Diagnostics

The molecular evolution of acquired resistance to targeted EGFR blockade in colorectal cancers

Open access
Diaz Jr, Luis A., Williams, Richard T., Wu, Jian, Kinde, Isaac, Hecht, J. Randolph, Berlin, Jordan, Allen, Benjamin, Bozic, Ivana +5 more·2012·Nature

Abstract

Colorectal tumours that are wild type for KRAS are often sensitive to EGFR blockade, but almost always develop resistance within several months of initiating therapy. The mechanisms underlying this acquired resistance to anti-EGFR antibodies are largely unknown. This situation is in marked contrast to that of small-molecule targeted agents, such as inhibitors of ABL, EGFR, BRAF and MEK, in which mutations in the genes encoding the protein targets render the tumours resistant to the effects of the drugs. The simplest hypothesis to account for the development of resistance to EGFR blockade is that rare cells with KRAS mutations pre-exist at low levels in tumours with ostensibly wild-type KRAS genes. Although this hypothesis would seem readily testable, there is no evidence in pre-clinical models to support it, nor is there data from patients. To test this hypothesis, we determined whether mutant KRAS DNA could be detected in the circulation of 28 patients receiving monotherapy with panitumumab, a therapeutic anti-EGFR antibody. We found that 9 out of 24 (38%) patients whose tumours were initially KRAS wild type developed detectable mutations in KRAS in their sera, three of which developed multiple different KRAS mutations. The appearance of these mutations was very consistent, generally occurring between 5 and 6 months following treatment. Mathematical modelling indicated that the mutations were present in expanded subclones before the initiation of panitumumab treatment. These results suggest that the emergence of KRAS mutations is a mediator of acquired resistance to EGFR blockade and that these mutations can be detected in a non-invasive manner. They explain why solid tumours develop resistance to targeted therapies in a highly reproducible fashion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature11219

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies of pre-treatment and post-treatment samples identify multiple mechanisms of tumor evolution via low-frequency pre-existing mutations that expand after treatment and/or previously undetectable mutations induced by therapy de novo.

    “Studies of pre-treatment and post-treatment samples identify multiple mechanisms of tumor evolution both via low-frequency pre-existing mutations that expand after treatment and/or previously undetectable mutations that are induced by therapy de novo [99,100].”

    From KRAS: Biology, Inhibition, and Mechanisms of Inhibitor Resistance (2024) · cites this paper as [100]

    The study’s analysis of longitudinal samples supports expansion of low-frequency resistance mutations already present before panitumumab therapy. It does not support the claim that therapy induced mutations de novo: the paper reports that, for each analyzed lesion, it rejected the possibility that the observed KRAS mutations were absent at treatment start (>95% confidence). The supplied copy labels this passage “Abstract” and gives no page number. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Patients with advanced WT RAS colorectal cancer commonly and often rapidly acquire resistance to anti-EGFR monotherapy.

    “and patients commonly, and often rapidly, acquire resistance [5].”

    From Combined blockade of EGFR and glutamine metabolism in preclinical models of colorectal cancer (2020) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Abstract says WT KRAS colorectal tumors almost always develop resistance within several months of EGFR blockade. It also reports clinically evident progression at 23 ± 10 weeks in 24 patients with WT KRAS tumors receiving panitumumab monotherapy. These passages support common, relatively rapid resistance, but establish it for WT KRAS tumors rather than specifically for the broader RAS-wild-type classification in the claim. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • KRAS acquired mutations are responsible for secondary resistance to anti-EGFR therapies in CRC.

    “We and others previously reported that KRAS acquired mutations are responsible for secondary resistance to anti-EGFR therapies in CRC(22, 23).”
  • KRAS point mutations and gene copy number gains are responsible for acquired resistance in 38-60% of patients who relapse on cetuximab or panitumumab.

    “KRAS point mutations and gene copy number gains are responsible not only for primary but also for acquired resistance in 38–60 % of patients who relapse on cetuximab or panitumumab [37-39].”
  • KRAS alterations can be identified noninvasively 5-10 months before radiographic disease progression by analyzing cell-free circulating tumor DNA.

    “KRAS alterations could be identified noninvasively 5–10 months before radiographic disease progression by analyzing cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) [37, 38].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Diaz Jr, L. A., Williams, R. T., Wu, J., Kinde, I., Hecht, J. R., Berlin, J., Allen, B., Bozic, I., Reiter, J. G., Nowak, M. A., Kinzler, K. W., Oliner, K. S., & Vogelstein, B.
Affiliations
  • Amgen (United States) (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Oliner, Kelly S.
Venue
Nature
Published
2012-06
Volume
486
Issue
7404
Pages
537-540
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2116731538
Cited by
1,713
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 106 · 2021: 100 · 2020: 109 · 2019: 155 · 2018: 141 · 2017: 167 · 2016: 187 · 2015: 186 · 2014: 169 · 2013: 141 · 2012: 37
FWCI
83.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Institute of Science and Technology Austria (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institutes of Health (n01cn43309-10-0-1)
  • National Cancer Institute (N01 CN043309, CA095103, CA 57345, R01CA129825, CA43460, N01 CN43309, P50CA095103, R37CA043460, R01CA057345, CA129825, P50CA062924, R37CA057345, CA 62924)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM058008, R01GM078986)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Keywords
acquired drug resistance, KRAS mutation, EGFR inhibition, anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, panitumumab, cetuximab, colorectal cancer, circulating tumor DNA, clonal evolution, combination therapy, tumor recurrence
MeSH terms
Panitumumab, Antibodies, Monoclonal, DNA, Neoplasm, Humans, Mutation, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Genes, ras, Selection, Genetic, Time Factors, Colorectal Neoplasms, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), ras Proteins, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Evolution, Molecular, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review