Cited by 8Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcareHealth disparities and outcomesCultural Competency in Health Care

The clinical examination and socially at-risk populations

Murphy, Karly A., Ellison-Barnes, Alejandra, Johnson, Erica N., Cooper, Lisa A.·2018·Medical Clinics of North America

Abstract

Data from the United States show that persons from low socioeconomic backgrounds, those who are socially isolated, belong to racial or ethnic minority groups, or identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender experience health disparities at a higher rate. Clinicians must transition from a biomedical to a biopsychosocial framework within the clinical examination to better address social determinants of health that contribute to health disparities. We review the characteristics of successful patient-clinician interactions. We describe strategies for relationship-centered care within routine encounters. Our goal is to train clinicians to mitigate differences and reduce disparities in health care delivery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mcna.2017.12.013

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murphy, K. A., Ellison-Barnes, A., Johnson, E. N., & Cooper, L. A.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Murphy, Karly A.
Venue
Medical Clinics of North America
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
102
Issue
3
Pages
521-532
ISSN
0025-7125 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2797299765
Cited by
8
References
51
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Clinics of North America (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
Keywords
health disparities, social determinants of health, biopsychosocial model, patient-clinician interaction, relationship-centered care, low socioeconomic status, social isolation, racial and ethnic minorities, LGBTQ+ patients, physical examination
MeSH terms
Decision Making, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Minority Groups, Physical Examination, Physician-Patient Relations, Risk Factors, United States, Patient-Centered Care, Cultural Competency, Health Status Disparities, Healthcare Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review