Cited by 34Structural Health Monitoring TechniquesMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms ResearchInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

Performance of swarm intelligence based chaotic meta-heuristic algorithms in civil structural health monitoring

Das, Swagato, Saha, Purnachandra·2021·Measurement

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108533

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Das, S., & Saha, P.
Affiliations
KIIT University (IN)
Corresponding author
Das, Swagato
Venue
Measurement
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
169
Pages
108533
ISSN
0263-2241 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3089405697
Cited by
34
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8
FWCI
3.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Measurement (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Keywords
structural health monitoring, swarm intelligence, metaheuristic optimization, chaotic maps, bird swarm algorithm, firefly algorithm, whale optimization algorithm, dragonfly algorithm, flower pollination algorithm, damage detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review