Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 0

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

A deep learning framework for robust attitude estimation in dynamic environments from six-axis raw inertial measurements

Ding, Wei, Hu, Yansen, Sun, Wei, Yue, Zhe·2026·Measurement

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.measurement.2026.122485

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Pasha, 2024, MEMS fault-tolerant machine learning algorithm assisted attitude estimation for fixed-wing UAVs, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 129, 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107608 · DOI
  2. Zhai, 2025, Deep learning-aided Kalman filter for low-cost attitude estimation via angular accelerometer and gyroscope fusion, Measurement, 260
  3. Hashim, 2024, Adaptive neural network stochastic-filter-based controller for attitude tracking with disturbance rejection, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst., 35, 1217, 10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3183026 · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2022.3183026
  4. H. Fourati, D.E.C. Belkhiat, Multisensor attitude estimation: fundamental concepts and applications, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, 2016. Doi: 10.1201/9781315368795/MULTISENSOR-ATTITUDE-ESTIMATION-HASSEN-FOURATI-DJAMEL-EDDINE-CHOUAIB-BELKHIAT. · doi:10.1201/9781315368795
  5. Oveissi, 2024, Learning-based attitude estimation with noisy measurements and unknown gyro bias, in, International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), 2024, 168, 10.1109/ICMLA61862.2024.00029 · doi:10.1109/icmla61862.2024.00029
  6. Hajiyev, 2022, Attitude and gyro bias estimation by SVD-aided EKF, Measurement, 205, 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.112209 · DOI
  7. de Croon, 2022, Accommodating unobservability to control flight attitude with optic flow, Nature, 610, 485, 10.1038/s41586-022-05182-2 · DOI
  8. Ratchatanantakit, 2023, A sensor fusion approach to MARG module orientation estimation for a real-time hand tracking application, Inf. Fusion, 90, 298, 10.1016/j.inffus.2022.09.017 · DOI
  9. Lu, 2025, An EKF based on aerodynamic constraints for fixed-wing UAV attitude estimation, IEEE Sens. J., 1
  10. Faraji, 2025, Design and implementation of an adaptive unscented Kalman filter with interval type-3 fuzzy set for an attitude and heading reference system considering gyroscope bias, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 223, 10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111870 · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111870
  11. Ding, 2025, Attitude estimation in challenging environments by integrating low-cost dual-antenna GNSS and MEMS MARG sensor, GPS Solut., 29, 49, 10.1007/s10291-024-01805-5 · doi:10.1007/s10291-024-01805-5
  12. Yi, 2024, Tightly coupled visual–inertial fusion for attitude estimation of spacecraft, Remote Sens., 16, 3063, 10.3390/rs16163063 · DOI
  13. Jin, 2025, Learning to estimate probabilistic attitude via matrix Fisher distribution with inertial sensor, Inf. Fusion, 119, 10.1016/j.inffus.2025.103001 · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2025.103001
  14. Nazarahari, 2021, 40 years of sensor fusion for orientation tracking via magnetic and inertial measurement units: methods, lessons learned, and future challenges, Inf. Fusion, 68, 67, 10.1016/j.inffus.2020.10.018 · DOI
  15. Golroudbari, 2023, Generalizable end-to-end deep learning frameworks for real-time attitude estimation using 6DoF inertial measurement units, Measurement, 217
  16. Wei, 2025, A robust adaptive error state Kalman filter for MEMS IMU attitude estimation under dynamic acceleration, Measurement, 242, 10.1016/j.measurement.2024.116097 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Wei, 2025, Robust optimization algorithm for attitude estimation based on multisensor fusion under magnetic disturbance conditions, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 74
  18. Y. Tang, L. Hu, Q. Zhang, W. Pan, Reinforcement learning compensated extended Kalman filter for attitude estimation, in: 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Itelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Pragur, Czech Republic, 2021. Doi: 10.1109/IROS51168.2021.9635963. · DOI
  19. Jia, 2024, Learning Chebyshev neural network-based spacecraft attitude tracking control ensuring finite-time prescribed performance, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 148, 10.1016/j.ast.2024.109085 · doi:10.1016/j.ast.2024.109085
  20. Vertzberger, 2022, Adaptive attitude estimation using a hybrid model-learning approach, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 71, 1, 10.1109/TIM.2022.3205003 · DOI
  21. M. Liu, S. Yang, A. Rathee, W. Du, Orientation estimation piloted by deep reinforcement learning, in: 2024 IEEE/ACM Ninth International Conference on Internet-of-Things Design and Implementation (IoTDI), 2024: pp. 134–145. Doi: 10.1109/IoTDI61053.2024.00016. · DOI
  22. Sartori, 2024, Learning-based mitigation of soft error effects on quaternion Kalman filter processing, IEEE Sens. J., 24, 1079, 10.1109/JSEN.2023.3336054 · DOI
  23. Esfahani, 2020, OriNet: Robust 3-D orientation estimation with a single particular IMU, IEEE Rob. Autom. Lett., 5, 399, 10.1109/LRA.2019.2959507 · DOI
  24. Niño-Tejada, 2025, Upper limb joint angle estimation using a reduced number of IMU sensors and recurrent neural networks, Electronics, 14, 3039, 10.3390/electronics14153039 · DOI
  25. Choi, 2023, Effects of data augmentation on the nine-axis IMU-based orientation estimation accuracy of a recurrent neural network, Sensors, 23, 7458, 10.3390/s23177458 · doi:10.3390/s23177458
  26. Ok, 2021, Estimation of vehicle attitude, acceleration, and angular velocity using convolutional neural network and dual extended Kalman filter, Sensors, 21, 1282, 10.3390/s21041282 · doi:10.3390/s21041282
  27. Oh, 2024, Azimuth estimation based on CNN and LSTM for geomagnetic and inertial sensors data, ICT Express, 10, 626, 10.1016/j.icte.2024.01.003 · doi:10.1016/j.icte.2024.01.003
  28. Al-Sharman, 2020, Deep-learning-based neural network training for state estimation enhancement: application to attitude estimation, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 69, 24, 10.1109/TIM.2019.2895495 · DOI
  29. Li, 2023, Attitude estimation using iterative indirect Kalman with neural network for inertial sensors, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 72
  30. Han, 2025, Neural network aided extended Kalman filter for dual-band infrared attitude estimation, IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng., 1
  31. Stroobants, 2025, Neuromorphic attitude estimation and control, IEEE Rob. Autom. Lett., 10, 4858, 10.1109/LRA.2025.3553418 · DOI
  32. Brossard, 2020, Denoising IMU gyroscopes with deep learning for open-loop attitude estimation, IEEE Rob. Autom. Lett., 5, 4796
  33. Cui, 2024, Enhanced vehicle heading estimation for magnetometer/gyroscope integration with random magnetic interference detection based on Pearson correlation coefficient, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 73, 10.1109/TIM.2023.3343746 · doi:10.1109/tim.2023.3343746
  34. X. Dai, V. Nateghi, H. Fourati, C. Prieur, Q-learning-based noise covariance adaptation in Kalman filter for MARG sensors attitude estimation, in: 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Inertial Sensors and Systems (INERTIAL), IEEE, Avignon, France, 2022. Doi: 10.1109/INERTIAL53425.2022.9787752. · DOI
  35. Brotchie, 2022, Leveraging self-attention mechanism for attitude estimation in smartphones, Sensors, 22, 9011, 10.3390/s22229011 · DOI
  36. D. Weber, C. Guhmann, T. Seel, Neural networks versus conventional filters for inertial-sensor-based attitude estimation, in: 2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION), IEEE, Rustenburg, South Africa, 2020: pp. 1–8. Doi: 10.23919/FUSION45008.2020.9190634. · DOI
  37. Hoang, 2022, Yaw/Heading optimization by machine learning model based on MEMS magnetometer under harsh conditions, Measurement, 193
  38. Rong, 2025, A fast complementary filter for avoiding the magnetometer measurements from influencing the calculation of pitch and roll, IEEE Sens. J., 25, 11521, 10.1109/JSEN.2025.3540537 · doi:10.1109/jsen.2025.3540537
  39. C. Chen, P. Zhao, C.X. Lu, W. Wang, A. Markham, N. Trigoni, OxIOD: The dataset for deep inertial odometry, arXiv (2018). Doi: 10.48550/arxiv.1809.07491. · DOI
  40. Burri, 2016, The EuRoC micro aerial vehicle datasets, Int. J. Rob. Res., 35, 1157, 10.1177/0278364915620033 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Wu, 2025, Attitude estimation using an adaptive generalized complementary filter, Measurement, 251, 10.1016/j.measurement.2025.117265 · doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2025.117265
  42. Mahony, 2008, Nonlinear complementary filters on the special orthogonal group, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 53, 1203, 10.1109/TAC.2008.923738 · DOI · Paper page
  43. S.O.H. Madgwick, A.J.L. Harrison, R. Vaidyanathan, Estimation of IMU and MARG orientation using a gradient descent algorithm, in: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, IEEE, Zurich, Switzerland, 2011: pp. 1–7. · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Ding, W., Hu, Y., Sun, W., & Yue, Z.
Venue
Measurement
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-10
Volume
287
Pages
122485
ISSN
0263-2241
Cited by
0
Language
en
Funders
  • International Science and Technology Cooperation Programme (2024JH2/101900009, 2025JH2/101900029)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province (2025-BS-0407)
  • Department of Education of Liaoning Province (LJ222510147003, LJ212410147050)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A deep learning framework for robust attitude estimation in dynamic environments from six-axis raw inertial measurements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.measurement.2026.122485
The paper
Ding, W., Hu, Y., Sun, W., & Yue, Z. (2026). A deep learning framework for robust attitude estimation in dynamic environments from six-axis raw inertial measurements. Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2026.122485

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.