The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimation of IMU and MARG orientation using a gradient descent algorithm
Abstract
This paper presents a novel orientation algorithm designed to support a computationally efficient, wearable inertial human motion tracking system for rehabilitation applications. It is applicable to inertial measurement units (IMUs) consisting of tri-axis gyroscopes and accelerometers, and magnetic angular rate and gravity (MARG) sensor arrays that also include tri-axis magnetometers. The MARG implementation incorporates magnetic distortion compensation. The algorithm uses a quaternion representation, allowing accelerometer and magnetometer data to be used in an analytically derived and optimised gradient descent algorithm to compute the direction of the gyroscope measurement error as a quaternion derivative. Performance has been evaluated empirically using a commercially available orientation sensor and reference measurements of orientation obtained using an optical measurement system. Performance was also benchmarked against the propriety Kalman-based algorithm of orientation sensor. Results indicate the algorithm achieves levels of accuracy matching that of the Kalman based algorithm; < 0.8° static RMS error, < 1.7° dynamic RMS error. The implications of the low computational load and ability to operate at small sampling rates significantly reduces the hardware and power necessary for wearable inertial movement tracking, enabling the creation of lightweight, inexpensive systems capable of functioning for extended periods of time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems
Kalman, R. E. (1960) · Journal of Basic Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.3662552 · Cited by 31,751
Measuring orientation of human body segments using miniature gyroscopes and accelerometers
Luinge, H. J., & Veltink, P. H. (2005) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/bf02345966 · Cited by 647
Cited by
Survey of Motion Tracking Methods Based on Inertial Sensors: A Focus on Upper Limb Human Motion
Filippeschi, A., Schmitz, N., Miezal, M., Bleser, G., Ruffaldi, E., & Stricker, D. (2017) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s17061257 · Cited by 361
Keeping a Good Attitude: A Quaternion-Based Orientation Filter for IMUs and MARGs
Valenti, R., Dryanovski, I., & Xiao, J. (2015) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s150819302 · Cited by 357
Wearable sensor-based real-time gait detection: A systematic review
Prasanth, H., Caban, M., Keller, U., Courtine, G., Ijspeert, A., Vallery, H., & von Zitzewitz, J. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21082727 · Cited by 348
Górriz, J. M., Ramírez, J., Ortíz, A., Martínez-Murcia, F. J., Segovia, F., Suckling, J., Leming, M., Zhang, Y.-D., Álvarez-Sánchez, J. R., Bologna, G., et al. (2020) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2020.05.078 · Cited by 319
A wearable system for gait training in subjects with Parkinson's disease
Casamassima, F., Ferrari, A., Milosevic, B., Ginis, P., Farella, E., & Rocchi, L. (2014) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s140406229 · Cited by 131
Metadata
- Authors
- Madgwick, S. O. H., Harrison, A. J. L., & Vaidyanathan, R.
- Venue
- 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 2011
- Pages
- 1-7
- ISSN
- 1945-7898 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160146756
- Cited by
- 2,068
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 87.40
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimation of IMU and MARG orientation using a gradient descent algorithm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icorr.2011.5975346
- The paper
- Madgwick, S. O. H., Harrison, A. J. L., & Vaidyanathan, R. (2011). Estimation of IMU and MARG orientation using a gradient descent algorithm. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics. https://doi.org/10.1109/icorr.2011.5975346
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.