Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 33

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Grape skin flour obtained from wine processing as an antioxidant in beef burgers

de Alencar, Maria Gracileide, de Quadros, Cedenir Perreira, Luna, Aridson Luiz Lima Pedrosa, Neto, Acácio Figueirêdo, da Costa, Mateus Matiuzzi, Queiroz, Mário Adriano Ávila, de Carvalho, Francisco Allan Leandro, da Silva Araújo, David Hans, Gois, Glayciane Costa, dos Anjos Santos, Victória Laysna, da Silva Filho, José Renaldo Vilar, de Souza Rodrigues, Rafael Torres·2022·Meat Science

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the best level of wine making by-product meal (WBM) as a natural antioxidant to replace butylhydroxytoluene (BHT) in beef burger stored at -20 °C for up to 120 days. The treatments consisted of control (basic formulation - BF, without antioxidant); BF with BHT; and BF with WBM0.5, WBM1.0, WBM1.5, and WBM2.0, with 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 g WBM/100 g BF, respectively. Up to 60 days of storage, the lipid oxidation value between BHT and WBM0.5 treatments did not differ and were lower than the values presented by the other treatments. On day 90 and 120, the lipid oxidation values of treatments BHT, WBM0.5, and WBM1.0 did not differ and were lower than the values presented by WBM1.5 and WBM2.0 treatments. Burgers from all treatments with WBM inclusion had crude fiber values above 3 g/100 g. WBM1.5 and WBM2.0 treatments had the worst scores for appearance, aroma, juiciness and tenderness, in addition to the highest cooking losses. WBM can be used at up to 1 g/100 g to replace BHT in frozen beef burgers. Higher levels of WBM inclusion increased lipid oxidation and negatively affected the sensory quality of burgers.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.meatsci.2022.108963

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. Abdelhakam, 2019, Quality characteristics of beef hamburger enriched with red grape pomace powder during freezing storage, Slovenian Veterinary Research, 56, 333
  2. Ahmad, 2020, Interaction study of dietary fibers (pectin and cellulose) with meat proteins using bioinformatics analysis: an In-Silico study, LWT - Food Science and Technology, 119, 10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108889 · DOI
  3. Almeida, 2015, Effect of jabuticaba peel extract on lipid oxidation, microbial stability and sensory properties of Bologna-type sausages during refrigerated storage, Meat Science, 110, 9, 10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.06.012 · DOI
  4. Bennemann, 2018, Bioactive compounds and antiradical activity in grape pomace flours from different cultivars dehydrated in a freeze dryer and in an oven, Brazilian Journal of Food Technology, 21
  5. Beres, 2019, Antioxidant dietary fibre from grape pomace flour or extract: Does it make any difference on the nutritional and functional value?, Journal of Functional Foods, 56, 276, 10.1016/j.jff.2019.03.014 · DOI
  6. Borella, 2019, Effect of rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) antioxidant in industrial processing of frozen-mixed hamburger during shelf life, Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 43, 1, 10.1111/jfpp.14092 · DOI
  7. Brenes, 2016, Use of polyphenol-rich grape by-products in monogastric nutrition. A review, Animal Feed Science and Technology, 211, 1, 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.09.016 · DOI
  8. Carmona-Jiménez, 2014, Simplification of the DPPH assay for estimating the antioxidant activity of wine and wine by-products, Food Chemistry, 165, 198, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.05.106 · DOI
  9. Carvalho, 2019, Replacement of meat by spinach on physicochemical and nutritional properties of chicken burgers, Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 43, 4, 10.1111/jfpp.13935 · DOI
  10. Castillo-Muñoz, 2010, Flavonol profiles of Vitis vinifera white grape cultivars, Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 23, 699, 10.1016/j.jfca.2010.03.017 · DOI
  11. Cilli, 2019, Effects of grape pomace flour on quality parameters of salmon burger, Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 44, 1
  12. Crippa, 2018, Red and processed meat consumption and risk of bladder cancer: A dose–response meta-analysis of epidemiological studies, European Journal of Nutrition, 57, 689, 10.1007/s00394-016-1356-0 · DOI
  13. Cronin, 2021, Dietary fibre modulates the gut microbiota, Nutrients, 13, 10.3390/nu13051655 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Das, 2020, A comprehensive review on antioxidant dietary fibre enriched meat-based functional foods, Trends in Food Science and Technology, 99, 323, 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.03.010 · DOI
  15. Echegaray, 2018, Chestnuts and by-products as source of natural antioxidants in meat and meat products: A review, Trends in Food Science & Technology, 82, 110, 10.1016/j.tifs.2018.10.005 · DOI
  16. Estévez, 2010, Effect of phenolic compounds on the formation of α-aminoadipic and γ-glutamic semialdehydes from myofibrillar proteins oxidized by copper, iron, and myoglobin, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 58, 4448, 10.1021/jf903757h · DOI
  17. Favre, 2019, Selectivity of pigments extraction from grapes and their partial retention in the pomace during red-winemaking, Food Chemistry, 277, 391, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.10.085 · DOI
  18. Fernandes, 2017, Evaluation of oxidative stability of lamb burger with Origanum vulgare extract, Food Chemistry, 233, 101, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.04.100 · DOI
  19. García, 2009, Beef hamburgers enriched in lycopene using dry tomato peel as an ingredient, Meat Science, 83, 45, 10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.03.009 · DOI
  20. García-Lomillo, 2017, Applications of wine pomace in the food industry: Approaches and functions, Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 16, 3, 10.1111/1541-4337.12238 · DOI
  21. Grau, 1952, Eine einfache methode zur bestimmung der Wasserbindung im Fleisch, Die Fleischwirtschaft, 4, 295
  22. Guerra-Rivas, 2016, Effects of grape pomace in growing lamb diets compared with vitamin E and grape seed extract on meat shelf life, Meat Science, 116, 221, 10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.02.022 · DOI
  23. Kedare, 2011, Genesis and development of DPPH method of antioxidant assay, Journal of Food Science and Technology, 48, 412, 10.1007/s13197-011-0251-1 · DOI
  24. Kosowska, 2017, Volatile compounds in meat and meat products, Food Science and Technology, 37, 1, 10.1590/1678-457x.08416 · DOI
  25. Kryževičūtė, 2017, Effect of raspberry pomace extracts isolated by high pressure extraction on the quality and shelf-life of beef burgers, International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 52, 1852, 10.1111/ijfs.13460 · DOI
  26. Kumar, 2015, Recent trends in the use of natural antioxidants for meat and meat products, Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 14, 796, 10.1111/1541-4337.12156 · DOI
  27. Lee, 2019, Development of a freshness indicator for monitoring the quality of beef during storage, Food Science and Biotechnology, 28, 1899, 10.1007/s10068-019-00633-5 · DOI
  28. Lee, 2017, Meat quality and storage characteristics of pork loin marinated in grape pomace, Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources, 37, 726, 10.5851/kosfa.2017.37.5.726 · DOI
  29. Li, 2016, Comparison of the antioxidant effects of quercitrin and isoquercitrin: Understanding the role of the 6″-OH group, Molecules, 21, 1
  30. López-Vargas, 2014, Quality characteristics of pork burger added with albedo-fiber powder obtained from yellow passion fruit (Passiflora edulis var. flavicarpa) co-products, Meat Science, 97, 270, 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.02.010 · DOI
  31. MacFie, 1989, Designs to balance the effect of order of presentation and first-order carry-over effects in hall tests, Journal of Sensory Studies, 4, 129, 10.1111/j.1745-459X.1989.tb00463.x · DOI
  32. Mainente, 2019, Evaluation of the sensory and physical properties of meat and fish derivatives containing grape pomace powders, International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 54, 952, 10.1111/ijfs.13850 · DOI
  33. Maluf, 2018, Cytoprotection of antioxidant biocompounds from grape pomace: Further exfoliant phytoactive ingredients for cosmetic products, Cosmetics, 5, 1, 10.3390/cosmetics5030046 · DOI
  34. Mensor, 2001, Screening of Brazilian plant extracts for antioxidant activity by the use of DPPH free radical method, Phytotherapy Research, 15, 127, 10.1002/ptr.687 · DOI
  35. Miltenburg, 1992, Relationship between blood hemoglobin, plasma and tissue iron, muscle heme pigment, and carcass color of veal, Journal of Animal Science, 70, 2766, 10.2527/1992.7092766x · DOI
  36. Natividade, 2013, Simultaneous analysis of 25 phenolic compounds in grape juice for HPLC: Method validation and characterization of São Francisco Valley samples, Microchemical Journal, 110, 665, 10.1016/j.microc.2013.08.010 · DOI
  37. Pereira, 2022, Effects of red-wine grape pomace on the quality and sensory attributes of beef hamburger patty, International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 57, 1814, 10.1111/ijfs.15559 · DOI
  38. Pietrasik, 2020, Utilization of pea starch and fibre fractions for replacement of wheat crumb in beef burgers, Meat Science, 161, 10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.107974 · DOI
  39. Raharjo, 1992, Improved speed, specificity, and limit of determination of an aqueous acid extraction thiobarbituric Acid-C18 method for measuring lipid peroxidation in beef, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 40, 2182, 10.1021/jf00023a027 · DOI
  40. Ribeiro, 2019, Natural antioxidants used in meat products: A brief review, Meat Science, 148, 181, 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.10.016 · DOI
  41. Rivero-Pérez, 2008, Contribution of anthocyanin fraction to the antioxidant properties of wine, Food and Chemical Toxicology, 46, 2815, 10.1016/j.fct.2008.05.014 · DOI
  42. Ryu, 2014, Effect of grape pomace powder addition on tbars and color of cooked pork sausages during storage, Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources, 34, 200, 10.5851/kosfa.2014.34.2.200 · DOI
  43. Sánchez-Zapata, 2010, Effect of tiger nut fibre on quality characteristics of pork burger, Meat Science, 85, 70, 10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.12.006 · DOI
  44. Sáyago-Ayerdi, 2009, Effect of grape antioxidant dietary fiber on the lipid oxidation of raw and cooked chicken hamburgers, LWT - Food Science and Technology, 42, 971, 10.1016/j.lwt.2008.12.006 · DOI
  45. Seabra, 2002, Fécula de mandioca e farinha de aveia como substitutos de gordura na formulação de hambúrguer de carne ovina, Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, 22, 245, 10.1590/S0101-20612002000300008 · DOI
  46. Selani, 2011, Wine industry residues extracts as natural antioxidants in raw and cooked chicken meat during frozen storage, Meat Science, 88, 397, 10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.01.017 · DOI
  47. Silva, 2020, Effect of drying methods on bioactive compounds and antioxidant capacity in grape skin residues from the new hybrid variety “BRS Magna”, Molecules, 25, 1, 10.3390/molecules25163701 · DOI
  48. Sousa, 2014, Chemical composition and bioactive compounds of grape pomace (Vitis vinifera L.), Benitaka variety, grown in the semiarid region of Northeast Brazil, Food Science and Technology, 34, 135, 10.1590/S0101-20612014000100020 · DOI
  49. Summers, 1994, Prooxidant effects of phenolic acids on the generalist herbivore Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): Potential mode of action for phenolic compounds in plant anti-herbivore chemistry, Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 24, 943, 10.1016/0965-1748(94)90023-X · DOI
  50. Tuffi, 2021, Grape residue flour as an antioxidant and fiber source in beef meatballs, British Food Journal, 123, 2831, 10.1108/BFJ-12-2020-1152 · DOI
  51. Urquiaga, 2018, The consumption of beef burgers prepared with wine grape pomace flour improves fasting glucose, plasma antioxidant levels, and oxidative damage markers in humans: A controlled trial, Nutrients, 10, 1, 10.3390/nu10101388 · DOI
  52. Vidot, 2020, Phenolic compounds limit or promote oxidative degradation of pectin related to iron-H2O2 ratio, LWT - Food Science and Technology, 125, 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109324 · DOI
  53. Wichchukit, 2015, The 9-point hedonic scale and hedonic ranking in food science: Some reappraisals and alternatives, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 95, 2167, 10.1002/jsfa.6993 · DOI
  54. Wood, 2008, Fat deposition, fatty acid composition and meat quality: A review, Meat Science, 78, 343, 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.07.019 · DOI
  55. Zhang, 2019, Understanding beef flavour and overall liking traits using two different methods for determination of thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS), Meat Science, 149, 114, 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.11.018 · DOI
  56. Zhu, 2015, Advance on the bioactivity and potential applications of dietary fibre from grape pomace, Food Chemistry, 186, 207, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.07.057 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
de Alencar, M. G., de Quadros, C. P., Luna, A. L. L. P., Neto, A. F., da Costa, M. M., Queiroz, M. A. Á., de Carvalho, F. A. L., da Silva Araújo, D. H., Gois, G. C., dos Anjos Santos, V. L., da Silva Filho, J. R. V., & de Souza Rodrigues, R. T.
Venue
Meat Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-12
Volume
194
Pages
108963
ISSN
0309-1740
Cited by
33
References
2
Language
en
Funders
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.