Cited by 106Gait Recognition and AnalysisProsthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsLower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies

Gait phase analysis based on a Hidden Markov Model

Bae, Joonbum, Tomizuka, Masayoshi·2011·Mechatronics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2011.03.003

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Bae, J., & Tomizuka, M.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Bae, Joonbum
Venue
Mechatronics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-09
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
961-970
ISSN
0957-4158 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056873772
Cited by
106
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Mechatronics (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarworks@UNIST (Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Keywords
hidden Markov models, gait rehabilitation, smart shoes, ground reaction force, posterior probability, gait analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review