The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Influence of contextual task constraints on preferred stride parameters and their variabilities during human walking
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Walking speed normally fluctuates slightly [29], with correlated fluctuations in stride length [16] consistent with the preferred stride length relationship [30].”
From Human walking in the real world: interactions between terrain type, gait parameters, and energy expenditure (2021) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“These data can reveal trends in walking speed, stride length, and stride variability [16], which may in turn reveal the effects of real-world terrain.”
From Human walking in the real world: interactions between terrain type, gait parameters, and energy expenditure (2021) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“Walking speed also generally determines stride length [16,29,36], which was not explicitly controlled and differed slightly with terrain.”
From Human walking in the real world: interactions between terrain type, gait parameters, and energy expenditure (2021) · cites this paper as [16]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kowalsky, D. B., Rebula, J. R., Ojeda, L. V., Adamczyk, P. G., & Kuo, A. D. (2021) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0228682 · Cited by 106
Self-citationThe energetic cost of human walking as a function of uneven terrain amplitude
Hosseini-Yazdi, S.-S., & Kuo, A. D. (2025) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.249840 · Cited by 10
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ojeda, L. V., Rebula, J. R., Kuo, A. D., & Adamczyk, P. G.
- ORCID
- Adamczyk, Peter G.
- Venue
- Medical Engineering & Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2015-08-04
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 929-936
- ISSN
- 1350-4533
- 1873-4030
- PMC
- PMC4604025
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 0
- Licence
- Funders
- U.S. National Institute on Aging (R44AG030815)
- U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH-09-2-0142)
- U.S. Office of Naval Research (ETOWL)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
