The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Assessment of algorithms for mitosis detection in breast cancer histopathology images
Open accessAbstract
The proliferative activity of breast tumors, which is routinely estimated by counting of mitotic figures in hematoxylin and eosin stained histology sections, is considered to be one of the most important prognostic markers. However, mitosis counting is laborious, subjective and may suffer from low inter-observer agreement. With the wider acceptance of whole slide images in pathology labs, automatic image analysis has been proposed as a potential solution for these issues. In this paper, the results from the Assessment of Mitosis Detection Algorithms 2013 (AMIDA13) challenge are described. The challenge was based on a data set consisting of 12 training and 11 testing subjects, with more than one thousand annotated mitotic figures by multiple observers. Short descriptions and results from the evaluation of eleven methods are presented. The top performing method has an error rate that is comparable to the inter-observer agreement among pathologists.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Image analysis and machine learning in digital pathology: challenges and opportunities
Madabhushi, A., & Lee, G. (2016) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.06.037 · Cited by 1,093
Self-citationAutomatic Segmentation of MR Brain Images With a Convolutional Neural Network
Moeskops, P., Viergever, M. A., Mendrik, A. M., de Vries, L. S., Benders, M. J. N. L., & Isgum, I. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2548501 · Cited by 861
Self-citationDeep neural network models for computational histopathology: A survey
Srinidhi, C. L., Ciga, O., & Martel, A. L. (2021) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2020.101813 · Cited by 749
AggNet: Deep Learning From Crowds for Mitosis Detection in Breast Cancer Histology Images
Albarqouni, S., Baur, C., Achilles, F., Belagiannis, V., Demirci, S., & Navab, N. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2528120 · Cited by 606
Deep learning in microscopy image analysis: a survey
Xing, F., Xie, Y., Su, H., Liu, F., & Yang, L. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2017.2766168 · Cited by 460
Metadata
- Authors
- Veta, M., van Diest, P. J., Willems, S. M., Wang, H., Madabhushi, A., Cruz-Roa, A., Gonzalez, F., Larsen, A. B. L., Vestergaard, J. S., Dahl, A. B., Cireşan, D. C., Schmidhuber, J., Giusti, A., Gambardella, L. M., Tek, F. B., Walter, T., Wang, C.-W., Kondo, S., Matuszewski, B. J., Precioso, F., Snell, V., Kittler, J., de Campos, T. E., Khan, A. M., Rajpoot, N. M., Arkoumani, E., Lacle, M. M., Viergever, M. A., & Pluim, J. P. W.
- Venue
- Medical Image Analysis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-02
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 237-248
- ISSN
- 1361-8415 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2132031490
- Cited by
- 480
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of algorithms for mitosis detection in breast cancer histopathology images. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.media.2014.11.010
- The paper
- Veta, M., van Diest, P. J., Willems, S. M., Wang, H., Madabhushi, A., Cruz-Roa, A., Gonzalez, F., Larsen, A. B. L., Vestergaard, J. S., Dahl, A. B., Cireşan, D. C., Schmidhuber, J., Giusti, A., Gambardella, L. M., Tek, F. B., Walter, T., Wang, C.-W., Kondo, S., Matuszewski, B. J., . . . Pluim, J. P. W. (2015). Assessment of algorithms for mitosis detection in breast cancer histopathology images. Medical Image Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2014.11.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
