Cited by 30Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesMedical Imaging and AnalysisUltrasound Imaging and Elastography

Feature-based fuzzy connectedness segmentation of ultrasound images with an object completion step

Open access
Rueda, Sylvia, Knight, Caroline L., Papageorghiou, Aris T., Alison Noble, J.·2015·Medical Image Analysis

Abstract

Medical ultrasound (US) image segmentation and quantification can be challenging due to signal dropouts, missing boundaries, and presence of speckle, which gives images of similar objects quite different appearance. Typically, purely intensity-based methods do not lead to a good segmentation of the structures of interest. Prior work has shown that local phase and feature asymmetry, derived from the monogenic signal, extract structural information from US images. This paper proposes a new US segmentation approach based on the fuzzy connectedness framework. The approach uses local phase and feature asymmetry to define a novel affinity function, which drives the segmentation algorithm, incorporates a shape-based object completion step, and regularises the result by mean curvature flow. To appreciate the accuracy and robustness of the methodology across clinical data of varying appearance and quality, a novel entropy-based quantitative image quality assessment of the different regions of interest is introduced. The new method is applied to 81 US images of the fetal arm acquired at multiple gestational ages, as a means to define a new automated image-based biomarker of fetal nutrition. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation shows that the segmentation method is comparable to manual delineations and robust across image qualities that are typical of clinical practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.media.2015.07.002

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 82 · Cited by 30

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Szilágyi T. Brady M. Brunner T. Joshi N. Local phase significance estimated with uncertainties to detect fibrotic regions from in vivo pancreatic cancer images Proceedings of the 13th Conference in Medical Image Understanding and Analysis, BMVA 2009 204 208
  2. Veronese E. Cosmi E. Visentin S. Poletti E. Grisan E. Estimation of fetal aorta intima-media thickness from ultrasound examination Proceedings of the International MICCAI Workshop on Perinatal and Paediatric Imaging: PaPI 2012 2012 81 88

Authors
Rueda, S., Knight, C. L., Papageorghiou, A. T., & Alison Noble, J.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Rueda, Sylvia
Venue
Medical Image Analysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
30-46
ISSN
1361-8415 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2178101284
Cited by
30
References
82
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Image Analysis (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (WT 088877/Z/09/Z, 088877/Z/09/Z, 088877)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (WT 088877/Z/09, WT088877/Z/09/Z)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Medical Imaging and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
Keywords
ultrasound image segmentation, fuzzy connectedness, monogenic signal, local phase, affinity function, mean curvature flow, speckle, signal dropout
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Humans, Image Enhancement, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Sensitivity and Specificity, Subtraction Technique, Ultrasonography, Reproducibility of Results, Fuzzy Logic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review