Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 322

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

DeepPET: A deep encoder–decoder network for directly solving the PET image reconstruction inverse problem

Open access
Häggström, Ida, Schmidtlein, C. Ross, Campanella, Gabriele, Fuchs, Thomas J.·2019·Medical Image Analysis

Abstract

&NA; The purpose of this research was to implement a deep learning network to overcome two of the major bottlenecks in improved image reconstruction for clinical positron emission tomography (PET). These are the lack of an automated means for the optimization of advanced image reconstruction algorithms, and the computational expense associated with these state‐of‐the art methods. We thus present a novel end‐to‐end PET image reconstruction technique, called DeepPET, based on a deep convolutional encoder–decoder network, which takes PET sinogram data as input and directly and quickly outputs high quality, quantitative PET images. Using simulated data derived from a whole‐body digital phantom, we randomly sampled the configurable parameters to generate realistic images, which were each augmented to a total of more than 291,000 reference images. Realistic PET acquisitions of these images were simulated, resulting in noisy sinogram data, used for training, validation, and testing the DeepPET network. We demonstrated that DeepPET generates higher quality images compared to conventional techniques, in terms of relative root mean squared error (11%/53% lower than ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM)/filtered back‐projection (FBP), structural similarity index (1%/11% higher than OSEM/FBP), and peak signal‐to‐noise ratio (1.1/3.8 dB higher than OSEM/FBP). In addition, we show that DeepPET reconstructs images 108 and 3 times faster than OSEM and FBP, respectively. Finally, DeepPET was successfully applied to real clinical data. This study shows that an end‐to‐end encoder–decoder network can produce high quality PET images at a fraction of the time compared to conventional methods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.media.2019.03.013

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

See all 322

Metadata

Authors
Häggström, I., Schmidtlein, C. R., Campanella, G., & Fuchs, T. J.
Venue
Medical Image Analysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
54
Pages
253-262
ISSN
1361-8415 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2798538010
Cited by
322
References
33
FWCI
25.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DeepPET: A deep encoder–decoder network for directly solving the PET image reconstruction inverse problem. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.media.2019.03.013
The paper
Häggström, I., Schmidtlein, C. R., Campanella, G., & Fuchs, T. J. (2019). DeepPET: A deep encoder–decoder network for directly solving the PET image reconstruction inverse problem. Medical Image Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2019.03.013

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.