The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DeepPET: A deep encoder–decoder network for directly solving the PET image reconstruction inverse problem
Open accessAbstract
&NA; The purpose of this research was to implement a deep learning network to overcome two of the major bottlenecks in improved image reconstruction for clinical positron emission tomography (PET). These are the lack of an automated means for the optimization of advanced image reconstruction algorithms, and the computational expense associated with these state‐of‐the art methods. We thus present a novel end‐to‐end PET image reconstruction technique, called DeepPET, based on a deep convolutional encoder–decoder network, which takes PET sinogram data as input and directly and quickly outputs high quality, quantitative PET images. Using simulated data derived from a whole‐body digital phantom, we randomly sampled the configurable parameters to generate realistic images, which were each augmented to a total of more than 291,000 reference images. Realistic PET acquisitions of these images were simulated, resulting in noisy sinogram data, used for training, validation, and testing the DeepPET network. We demonstrated that DeepPET generates higher quality images compared to conventional techniques, in terms of relative root mean squared error (11%/53% lower than ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM)/filtered back‐projection (FBP), structural similarity index (1%/11% higher than OSEM/FBP), and peak signal‐to‐noise ratio (1.1/3.8 dB higher than OSEM/FBP). In addition, we show that DeepPET reconstructs images 108 and 3 times faster than OSEM and FBP, respectively. Finally, DeepPET was successfully applied to real clinical data. This study shows that an end‐to‐end encoder–decoder network can produce high quality PET images at a fraction of the time compared to conventional methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition
Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.1556 · Cited by 114,148
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2003.819861 · Cited by 57,892
Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Inverse Problems in Imaging
Jin, K. H., McCann, M. T., Froustey, E., & Unser, M. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2017.2713099 · Cited by 2,529
Low-Dose CT With a Residual Encoder-Decoder Convolutional Neural Network
Chen, H., Zhang, Y., Kalra, M. K., Lin, F., Chen, Y., Liao, P., Zhou, J., & Wang, G. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2017.2715284 · Cited by 1,866
Image reconstruction by domain-transform manifold learning
Zhu, B., Liu, J. Z., Cauley, S. F., Rosen, B. R., & Rosen, M. S. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25988 · Cited by 1,694
4D XCAT phantom for multimodality imaging research
Segars, W. P., Sturgeon, G., Mendonca, S., Grimes, J., & Tsui, B. M. W. (2010) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.3480985 · Cited by 1,287
Yang, G., Yu, S., Dong, H., Slabaugh, G., Dragotti, P. L., Ye, X., Liu, F., Arridge, S., Keegan, J., Guo, Y., et al. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2017.2785879 · Cited by 1,081
Learned Primal-Dual Reconstruction
Adler, J., & Oktem, O. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2018.2799231 · Cited by 758
Penalized weighted least-squares image reconstruction for positron emission tomography
Fessler, J. A. (1994) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.293921 · Cited by 611
Cited by
Mayerhoefer, M. E., Materka, A., Langs, G., Häggström, I., Szczypiński, P., Gibbs, P., & Cook, G. (2020) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.118.222893 · Cited by 1,777
Self-citationDeep learning for tomographic image reconstruction
Wang, G., Ye, J. C., & De Man, B. (2020) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-020-00273-z · Cited by 531
How to Design AI-Driven Clinical Trials in Nuclear Medicine
Delso, G., Cirillo, D., Kaggie, J. D., Valencia, A., Metser, U., & Veit-Haibach, P. (2021) · Seminars in Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2020.09.003 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Häggström, I., Schmidtlein, C. R., Campanella, G., & Fuchs, T. J.
- Venue
- Medical Image Analysis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-05
- Volume
- 54
- Pages
- 253-262
- ISSN
- 1361-8415 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2798538010
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 25.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DeepPET: A deep encoder–decoder network for directly solving the PET image reconstruction inverse problem. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.media.2019.03.013
- The paper
- Häggström, I., Schmidtlein, C. R., Campanella, G., & Fuchs, T. J. (2019). DeepPET: A deep encoder–decoder network for directly solving the PET image reconstruction inverse problem. Medical Image Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2019.03.013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.