CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 531

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deep learning for tomographic image reconstruction

Wang, Ge, Ye, Jong Chul, De Man, Bruno·2020·Nature Machine Intelligence
DOI 10.1038/s42256-020-00273-z
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s42256-020-00273-z

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 136

  1. Barrett, H., Myers, K., Hoeschen, C., Kupinski, M. & Little, M. Task-based measures of image quality and their relation to radiation dose and patient risk. Phys. Med. Biol. 60, R1 (2015). · DOI
  2. Floyd, C. An artificial neural network for SPECT image reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 10, 485–487 (1991). · DOI
  3. Yan, H. & Mao, J. Data truncation artifact reduction in MR imaging using a multilayer neural network. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 12, 73–77 (1993). · DOI
  4. Wang, G. A perspective on deep imaging. IEEE Access 4, 8914–8924 (2016). · DOI
  5. Wang, G., Ye, J. C., Mueller, K. & Fessler, J. A. Image reconstruction is a new frontier of machine learning. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 37, 1289–1296 (2018). · DOI
  6. McCann, M. T., Jin, K. H. & Unser, M. Convolutional neural networks for inverse problems in imaging: a review. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 34, 85–95 (2017). · DOI
  7. Ravishankar, S., Ye, J. C. & Fessler, J. A. Image reconstruction: from sparsity to data-adaptive methods and machine learning. Proc. IEEE 108, 86–109 (2019). · DOI
  8. Sahiner, B. et al. Deep learning in medical imaging and radiation therapy. Med. Phys. 46, e1–e36 (2019). · DOI
  9. Gong, K., Berg, E., Cherry, S. R. & Qi, J. Machine learning in PET: from photon detection to quantitative image reconstruction. Proc. IEEE 108, 51–68 (2019). · DOI
  10. Nuyts, J., De Man, B., Fessler, J. A., Zbijewski, W. & Beekman, F. J. Modelling the physics in the iterative reconstruction for transmission computed tomography. Phys. Med. Biol. 58, R63 (2013). · DOI
  11. Hebert, T. & Leahy, R. A generalized EM algorithm for 3-D bayesian reconstruction from Poisson data using Gibbs priors. IEEE Trans. Med. Imagine 8, 194–202 (1989). · DOI
  12. Hounsfield, G. N. Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography): part 1. Description of system. Br. J. Radiol. 46, 1016–1022 (1973). · DOI
  13. Shepp, L. A. & Logan, B. F. The Fourier reconstruction of a head section. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 21, 21–43 (1974). · DOI
  14. Kang, E., Min, J. & Ye, J. C. A deep convolutional neural network using directional wavelets for low-dose X-ray CT reconstruction. Med. Phys. 44, e360–e375 (2017). · DOI
  15. Chen, H. et al. Low-dose CT via convolutional neural network. Biomed. Opt. Express 8, 679–694 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  16. Shan, H. et al. Competitive performance of a modularized deep neural network compared to commercial algorithms for low-dose CT image reconstruction. Nat. Mach. Intell. 1, 269–276 (2019). · DOI
  17. Sodickson, D. K. & Manning, W. J. Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays. Magn. Reson. Med. 38, 591–603 (1997). · DOI
  18. Pruessmann, K. P., Weiger, M., Scheidegger, M. B. & Boesiger, P. Sense: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 42, 952–962 (1999). · DOI
  19. Griswold, M. A. et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn. Reson. Med. 47, 1202–1210 (2002). · DOI
  20. Lustig, M., Donoho, D. & Pauly, J. M. Sparse MRI: the application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 58, 1182–1195 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  21. Brada, R. et al. Towards motion-robust MRI – autonomous motion timing and correction during MR scanning using multi-coil data and a deep-learning neural network. In Proc. ISMRM Twenty Seventh Annual Meeting (ISMRM, 2019).
  22. Hammernik, K. et al. Learning a variational network for reconstruction of accelerated MRI data. Magn. Reson. Med. 79, 3055–3071 (2018). · DOI
  23. Kwon, K., Kim, D. & Park, H. A parallel MR imaging method using multilayer perceptron. Med. Phys. 44, 6209–6224 (2017). · DOI
  24. Sun, J., Li, H. & Xu, Z. Deep ADMM-Net for compressive sensing MRI. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 10–18 (NeurIPS, 2016).
  25. Wang, S. et al. Accelerating magnetic resonance imaging via deep learning. In 2016 IEEE 13th Int. Symp. Biomedical Imaging 514–517 (IEEE, 2016). · DOI
  26. Defrise, M. et al. Exact and approximate rebinning algorithms for 3-D PET data. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 16, 145–158 (1997). · DOI
  27. Fink, M. Time reversal of ultrasonic fields. I. Basic principles. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelec. Freq. Control 39, 555–566 (1992). · DOI
  28. Lee, D., Yoo, J., Tak, S. & Ye, J. Deep residual learning for accelerated MRI using magnitude and phase networks. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 65, 1985–1995 (2018). · DOI
  29. Gong, K., Catana, C., Qi, J. & Li, Q. PET image reconstruction using deep image prior. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 38, 1655–1665 (2018). · DOI
  30. Qian, H., Rui, X. & Ahn, S. Deep learning models for PET scatter estimations. In 2017 IEEE Nuclear Science Symp. Medical Imaging Conf. 1–5 (IEEE, 2017). · DOI
  31. Rust, M. J., Bates, M. & Zhuang, X. Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy STORM. Nat. Methods 3, 793–796 (2006). · DOI
  32. Hess, S. T., Girirajan, T. P. & Mason, M. D. Ultra-high resolution imaging by fluorescence photoactivation localization microscopy. Biophys. J. 91, 4258 (2006). · DOI
  33. Betzig, E. et al. Imaging intracellular fluorescent proteins at nanometer resolution. Science 313, 1642–1645 (2006). · DOI
  34. Nehme, E., Weiss, L. E., Michaeli, T. & Shechtman, Y. DeepSTORM: super-resolution single-molecule microscopy by deep learning. Optica 5, 458–464 (2018). · DOI
  35. Rivenson, Y. et al. Deep learning microscopy. Optica 4, 1437–1443 (2017). · DOI
  36. Liu, T. et al. Deep learning-based super-resolution in coherent imaging systems. Sci. Rep. 9, 3926 (2019).
  37. Rivenson, Y., Zhang, Y., Günaydın, H., Teng, D. & Ozcan, A. Phase recovery and holographic image reconstruction using deep learning in neural networks. Light Sci. Appl. 7, 17141 (2018). · DOI
  38. Li, S., Deng, M., Lee, J., Sinha, A. & Barbastathis, G. Imaging through glass diffusers using densely connected convolutional networks. Optica 5, 803–813 (2018). · DOI
  39. Sun, Y., Xia, Z. & Kamilov, U. S. Efficient and accurate inversion of multiple scattering with deep learning. Opt. Express 26, 14678–14688 (2018). · DOI
  40. Lyu, M. et al. Deep-learning-based ghost imaging. Sci. Rep. 7, 17865 (2017).
  41. Rivenson, Y. et al. Deep learning enhanced mobile-phone microscopy. ACS Photon. 5, 2354–2364 (2018). · DOI
  42. Xu, M. & Wang, L. V. Photoacoustic imaging in biomedicine. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 77, 041101 (2006). · DOI
  43. Zhou, Z. et al. High spatial–temporal resolution reconstruction of plane-wave ultrasound images with a multichannel multiscale convolutional neural network. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelec. Freq. Control 65, 1983–1996 (2018). · DOI
  44. Antholzer, S., Haltmeier, M. & Schwab, J. Deep learning for photoacoustic tomography from sparse data. Inverse Prob. Sci. Eng. 27, 987–1005 (2019). · DOI
  45. Davoudi, N., Deán-Ben, X. L. & Razansky, D. Deep learning optoacoustic tomography with sparse data. Nat. Mach. Intell. 1, 453–460 (2019). · DOI
  46. Wolterink, J. M., Leiner, T., Viergever, M. A. & Išgum, I. Generative adversarial networks for noise reduction in low-dose CT. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 36, 2536–2545 (2017). · DOI
  47. Yang, G. et al. DAGAN: deep de-aliasing generative adversarial networks for fast compressed sensing MRI reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 37, 1310–1321 (2017). · DOI
  48. Bubba, T. A. et al. Learning the invisible: a hybrid deep learning-shearlet framework for limited angle computed tomography. Inverse Prob. 35, 064002 (2019). · DOI
  49. Kutyniok, G. & Labate, D. Shearlets: Multiscale Analysis for Multivariate Data (Springer, 2012). · DOI
  50. Zhang, Y. & Yu, H. Convolutional neural network based metal artifact reduction in X-ray computed tomography. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 37, 1370–1381 (2018). · DOI
  51. Vishnevskiy, V., Walheim, J. & Kozerke, S. Deep variational network for rapid 4D flow MRI reconstruction. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2, 228–235 (2020). · DOI
  52. Eo, T. et al. KIKI-net: cross-domain convolutional neural networks for reconstructing undersampled magnetic resonance images. Magn. Reson. Med. 80, 2188–2201 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  53. Qin, C. et al. Convolutional recurrent neural networks for dynamic mr image reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 38, 280–290 (2018). · DOI
  54. Vishnevskiy, V., Sanabria, S. J. & Goksel, O. Image reconstruction via variational network for real-time hand-held sound-speed imaging. In International Workshop on Machine Learning for Medical Image Reconstruction (eds Knoll, F. et al.) 120–128 (Springer, 2018). · DOI
  55. Adler, J. & Öktem, O. Learned primal-dual reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 37, 1322–1332 (2018). · DOI
  56. Gupta, H., Jin, K. H., Nguyen, H. Q., McCann, M. T. & Unser, M. CNN-based projected gradient descent for consistent CT image reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 37, 1440–1453 (2018). · DOI
  57. Chen, H. et al. LEARN: Learned experts’ assessment-based reconstruction network for sparse-data CT. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 37, 1333–1347 (2018). · DOI
  58. Cheng, L., Ahn, S., Ross, S. G., Qian, H. & De Man, B. Accelerated iterative image reconstruction using a deep learning based leapfrogging strategy. In Int. Conf. Fully Three-Dimensional Image Reconstruction in Radiology and Nuclear Medicine 715–720 (Fully 3D, 2017).
  59. Chun, I. Y., Huang, Z., Lim, H. & Fessler, J. Momentum-net: fast and convergent iterative neural network for inverse problems. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2020.3012955 (2020). · DOI
  60. Aggarwal, H. K., Mani, M. P. & Jacob, M. MoDL: model-based deep learning architecture for inverse problems. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 38, 394–405 (2018). · DOI
  61. Hauptmann, A. et al. Model-based learning for accelerated, limited-view 3-D photoacoustic tomography. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 37, 1382–1393 (2018). · DOI
  62. Biswas, S., Aggarwal, H. K. & Jacob, M. Dynamic MRI using model-based deep learning and SToRM priors: MoDL-SToRM. Magn. Res. Med. 82, 485–494 (2019). · DOI
  63. Lyu, Q., Shan, H., Xie, Y., Li, D. & Wang, G. Cine cardiac MRI motion artifact reduction using a recurrent neural network. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.12700 (2020). · arXiv
  64. Gong, K. et al. Iterative PET image reconstruction using convolutional neural network representation. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 38, 675–685 (2018). · DOI
  65. Wu, D., Kim, K., El Fakhri, G. & Li, Q. Iterative low-dose CT reconstruction with priors trained by artificial neural network. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 36, 2479–2486 (2017). · DOI
  66. Lim, H., Chun, I. Y., Fessler, J. & Dewaraja, Y. Improved low count quantitative SPECT reconstruction with a trained deep learning based regularizer. J. Nucl. Med. 60, 42 (2019).
  67. Gao, Y. et al. A feasibility study of extracting tissue textures from a previous full-dose CT database as prior knowledge for Bayesian reconstruction of current low-dose CT images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 38, 1981–1992 (2019). · DOI
  68. Buzzard, G. T., Chan, S. H., Sreehari, S. & Bouman, C. A. Plug-and-play unplugged: optimization-free reconstruction using consensus equilibrium. SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 11, 2001–2020 (2018). · DOI
  69. Liu, J. et al. RARE: Image reconstruction using deep priors learned without ground truth. IEEE J. Selected Topics Signal Process. 14, 1088–1099 (2020). · DOI
  70. Wu, Z. et al. SIMBA: Scalable inversion in optical tomography using deep denoising priors. IEEE J. Selected Topics Signal Process. 14, 1163–1175 (2020). · DOI
  71. Ulyanov, D., Vedaldi, A. & Lempitsky, V. Deep image prior. In Proc. IEEE Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 9446–9454 (IEEE, 2018).
  72. Jin, K. H., Gupta, H., Yerly, J., Stuber, M. & Unser, M. Time-dependent deep image prior for dynamic MRI. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.01684 (2019). · arXiv
  73. Zhu, B., Liu, J. Z., Cauley, S. F., Rosen, B. R. & Rosen, M. S. Image reconstruction by domain-transform manifold learning. Nature 555, 487–492 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  74. Ye, D. H., Buzzard, G. T., Ruby, M. & Bouman, C. A. Deep back projection for sparse-view CT reconstruction. In 2018 IEEE Global Conf. Signal and Information Processing (IEEE, 2018). · DOI
  75. Li, Y., Li, K., Zhang, C., Montoya, J. & Chen, G.-H. Learning to reconstruct computed tomography images directly from sinogram data under a variety of data acquisition conditions. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 38, 2469–2481 (2019). · DOI
  76. Fu, L. & De Man, B. A hierarchical approach to deep learning and its application to tomographic reconstruction. In 15th Int. Meeting on Fully Three-Dimensional Image Reconstruction in Radiology and Nuclear Medicine 1107202 (International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2019). · DOI
  77. Whiteley, W., Luk, W. K. & Gregor, J. DirectPET: full-size neural network PET reconstruction from sinogram data. J. Med. Imaging 7, 032503 (2020). · DOI
  78. Häggström, I., Schmidtlein, C. R., Campanella, G. & Fuchs, T. J. DeepPET: a deep encoder–decoder network for directly solving the PET image reconstruction inverse problem. Med. Image Anal. 54, 253–262 (2019). · DOI
  79. Würfl, T. et al. Deep learning computed tomography: learning projection-domain weights from image domain in limited angle problems. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 37, 1454–1463 (2018). · DOI
  80. Han, Y. & Ye, J. C. One network to solve all ROIs: deep learning CT for any ROI using differentiated backprojection. Med. Phys. 46, e855–e872 (2019). · DOI
  81. Han, Y., Kim, J. & Ye, J. C. Differentiated backprojection domain deep learning for conebeam artifact removal. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 39, 3571–3582 (2020). · DOI
  82. Claus, B. E., Jin, Y., Gjesteby, L. A., Wang, G. & De Man, B. Metal-artifact reduction using deep-learning based sinogram completion: initial results. In Proc. 14th Int. Meeting Fully Three-Dimensional Image Reconstruction Radiology Nuclear Medicine 631–634 (Fully 3D, 2017).
  83. Ghani, M. U. & Karl, W. C. Fast enhanced CT metal artifact reduction using data domain deep learning. IEEE Trans. Comput. Imaging 6, 181–193 (2019). · DOI
  84. De Man, Q. et al. A two-dimensional feasibility study of deep learning-based feature detection and characterization directly from CT sinograms. Med. Phys. 46, e790–e800 (2019). · DOI
  85. Han, Y., Sunwoo, L. & Ye, J. C. k-space deep learning for accelerated MRI. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 39, 377–386 (2019). · DOI
  86. Lee, J., Han, Y., Ryu, J.-K., Park, J.-Y. & Ye, J. C. k-space deep learning for reference-free EPI ghost correction. Magn. Reson. Med. 82, 2299–2313 (2019). · DOI
  87. Akçakaya, M., Moeller, S., Weingärtner, S. & Uğurbil, K. Scan-specific robust artificial-neural-networks for k-space interpolation (RAKI) reconstruction: database-free deep learning for fast imaging. Magn. Res. Med. 81, 439–453 (2019). · DOI
  88. Pramanik, A., Aggarwal, H. & Jacob, M. Deep generalization of structured low-rank algorithms (Deep-SLR). IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2020.3014581 (2020). · DOI
  89. Luchies, A. C. & Byram, B. C. Deep neural networks for ultrasound beamforming. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 37, 2010–2021 (2018). · DOI
  90. Gasse, M. et al. High-quality plane wave compounding using convolutional neural networks. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelec. Freq. Control 64, 1637–1639 (2017). · DOI
  91. Khan, S., Huh, J. & Ye, J. C. Adaptive and compressive beamforming using deep learning for medical ultrasound. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelec. Freq. Control 67, 1558–1572 (2020). · DOI
  92. Luijten, B. et al. Deep learning for fast adaptive beamforming. In 2019 IEEE Int. Conf. Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 1333–1337 (IEEE, 2019). · DOI
  93. Yoon, Y. H., Khan, S., Huh, J. & Ye, J. C. Efficient B-mode ultrasound image reconstruction from sub-sampled RF data using deep learning. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 38, 325–336 (2018). · DOI
  94. Kang, E., Koo, H. J., Yang, D. H., Seo, J. B. & Ye, J. C. Cycle-consistent adversarial denoising network for multiphase coronary CT angiography. Med. Phys. 46, 550–562 (2019). · DOI
  95. Nguyen, T., Xue, Y., Li, Y., Tian, L. & Nehmetallah, G. Deep learning approach for Fourier ptychography microscopy. Opt. Express 26, 26470–26484 (2018). · DOI
  96. Lee, S., Han, S., Salama, P., Dunn, K. W. & Delp, E. J. Three dimensional blind image deconvolution for fluorescence microscopy using generative adversarial networks. In 2019 IEEE 16th Int. Symp. Biomedical Imaging 538–542 (IEEE, 2019). · DOI
  97. Villani, C. Optimal Transport: Old and New Vol. 338 (Springer, 2008). · DOI
  98. Lim, S., Lee, S.-E., Chang, S. & Ye, J. C. CycleGAN with a blur kernel for deconvolution microscopy: Optimal transport geometry. IEEE Trans. Comput. Imaging 6, 1127–1138 (2020). · DOI
  99. Li, M., Shan, H., Pryshchep, S., Lopez, M. M. & Wang, G. Deep adversarial network for super stimulated emission depletion imaging. J. Nanophoton. 14, 016009 (2020).
  100. Liu, F., Jang, H., Kijowski, R., Bradshaw, T. & McMillan, A. B. Deep learning MR imaging–based attenuation correction for PET/MR imaging. Radiology 286, 676–684 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  101. Hwang, D. et al. Improving the accuracy of simultaneously reconstructed activity and attenuation maps using deep learning. J. Nucl. Med. 59, 1624–1629 (2018). · DOI
  102. Dar, S. U. et al. Image synthesis in multi-contrast MRI with conditional generative adversarial networks. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 38, 2375–2388 (2019). · DOI
  103. Lee, D., Moon, W.-J. & Ye, J. C. Assessing the importance of magnetic resonance contrasts using collaborative generative adversarial networks. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2, 34–42 (2020). · DOI
  104. Lehtinen, J. et al. Noise2Noise: learning image restoration without clean data. In Int. Conf. Machine Learning 2965–2974 (PMLR, 2018).
  105. Yaman, B. et al. Self-supervised physics-based deep learning MRI reconstruction without fully-sampled data. In 2020 IEEE 17th Int. Symp. Biomedical Imaging 921–925 (IEEE, 2020). · DOI
  106. Wu, D., Ren, H. & Li, Q. Self-supervised dynamic CT perfusion image denoising with deep neural networks. IEEE Trans. Radiation Plasma Med. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRPMS.2020.2996566 (2020). · DOI
  107. Wu, D., Gong, K., Kim, K., Li, X. & Li, Q. Consensus neural network for medical imaging denoising with only noisy training samples. In Int. Conf. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention 741–749 (Springer, 2019). · DOI
  108. Donoho, D. L. Compressed sensing. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 52, 1289–1306 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  109. Ye, J. C., Han, Y. & Cha, E. Deep convolutional framelets: a general deep learning framework for inverse problems. SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 11, 991–1048 (2018). · DOI
  110. Ye, J. C. & Sung, W. K. Understanding geometry of encoder-decoder CNNs. In Proc. 36th Int. Conf. Machine Learning Vol. 97 (eds Chaudhuri, K. & Salakhutdinov, R.) 7064–7073 (PMLR, 2019).
  111. McCollough, C. H. et al. Low-dose CT for the detection and classification of metastatic liver lesions: results of the 2016 low dose CT grand challenge. Med. Phys. 44, e339–e352 (2017). · DOI
  112. Xu, X. G., Taranenko, V., Zhang, J. & Shi, C. A boundary-representation method for designing whole-body radiation dosimetry models: pregnant females at the ends of three gestational periods—RPI-P3, -P6 and -P9. Phys. Med. Biol. 52, 7023 (2007). · DOI
  113. Segars, W. P., Sturgeon, G., Mendonca, S., Grimes, J. & Tsui, B. M. 4D XCAT phantom for multimodality imaging research. Med. Phys. 37, 4902–4915 (2010). · DOI
  114. Krishna, A. & Mueller, K. Medical CT image generation with style. In 15th Int. Meeting on Fully Three-Dimensional Image Reconstruction in Radiology and Nuclear Medicine 1107234 (International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2019). · DOI
  115. De Man, B. et al. CatSim: a new computer assisted tomography simulation environment. In Medical Imaging 2007: Physics of Medical Imaging Vol. 6510 65102G (International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2007). · DOI
  116. Jia, X., Yan, H., Cerviño, L., Folkerts, M. & Jiang, S. B. A GPU tool for efficient, accurate, and realistic simulation of cone beam CT projections. Med. Phys. 39, 7368–7378 (2012). · DOI
  117. Abadi, E. et al. DukeSim: a realistic, rapid, and scanner-specific simulation framework in computed tomography. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 38, 1457–1465 (2018). · DOI
  118. De Man, B. et al. XCIST (X-ray-based Cancer Imaging Simulation Toolkit): a new open-source project (ITCR grant). In Institute for Mathematics and its Applications Workshop on Computational Imaging (IMA, 2019).
  119. Sharma, D. et al. In silico imaging tools from the VICTRE clinical trial. Med. Phys. 46, 3924–3928 (2019). · DOI
  120. Parisi, G. I., Kemker, R., Part, J. L., Kanan, C. & Wermter, S. Continual lifelong learning with neural networks: a review. Neural Netw. 113, 54–71 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  121. Konečný, J. et al. Federated learning: Strategies for improving communication efficiency. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.05492 (2016). · arXiv
  122. Krull, A., Buchholz, T.-O. & Jug, F. Noise2Void-learning denoising from single noisy images. In Proc. IEEE Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2129–2137 (IEEE, 2019. · DOI
  123. Liao, H., Lin, W.-A., Zhou, S. K. & Luo, J. ADN: artifact disentanglement network for unsupervised metal artifact reduction. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 39, 634–643 (2019). · DOI
  124. Locatello, F. et al. Challenging common assumptions in the unsupervised learning of disentangled representations. In Int. Conf. Machine Learning 4114–4124 (PMLR, 2019).
  125. Gjesteby, L., Xi, Y., Kalra, M. K., Yang, Q. & Wang, G. Hybrid imaging system for simultaneous spiral MR and X-ray (MRX) scans. IEEE Access 5, 1050–1061 (2016). · DOI
  126. Antun, V., Renna, F., Poon, C., Adcock, B. & Hansen, A. C. On instabilities of deep learning in image reconstruction and the potential costs of AI. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1907377117 (2020). · DOI
  127. Ozdag, M. Adversarial attacks and defenses against deep neural networks: a survey. Procedia Comp. Sci. 140, 152–161 (2018). · DOI
  128. Wu, W. et al. Stabilizing deep tomographic reconstruction networks. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.01846 (2020). · DOI
  129. Park, S. H. & Han, K. Methodologic guide for evaluating clinical performance and effect of artificial intelligence technology for medical diagnosis and prediction. Radiology 286, 800–809 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  130. Fan, F., Xiong, J. & Wang, G. On interpretability of artificial neural networks. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.02522 (2020). · arXiv
  131. Geis, J. R. et al. Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American multisociety statement. Radiology 293, 436–440 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  132. Wang, G., Zhang, Y., Ye, X. & Mou, X. Machine Learning for Tomographic Imaging (IOP, 2019). · DOI
  133. Poirot, M. G. et al. Physics-informed deep learning for dual-energy computed tomography image processing. Sci. Rep. 9, 17709 (2019). · DOI
  134. Kang, E., Chang, W., Yoo, J. & Ye, J. C. Deep convolutional framelet denosing for low-dose CT via wavelet residual network. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 37, 1358–1369 (2018). · DOI
  135. Ouyang, J., Chen, K. T., Gong, E., Pauly, J., Zaharchuk, G. & Ultra-low-dose, P. E. T. reconstruction using generative adversarial network with feature matching and task-specific perceptual loss. Med. Phys. 46, 3555–3564 (2019). · DOI
  136. Chen, K. T. et al. Ultra-low-dose 18F-florbetaben amyloid PET imaging using deep learning with multi-contrast MRI inputs. Radiology 290, 649–656 (2019). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 531

Metadata

Authors
Wang, G., Ye, J. C., & De Man, B.
Venue
Nature Machine Intelligence
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2020-12-10
Volume
2
Issue
12
Pages
737-748
ISSN
2522-5839
DOI
10.1038/s42256-020-00273-z
Cited by
531
References
7
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep learning for tomographic image reconstruction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s42256-020-00273-z
The paper
Wang, G., Ye, J. C., & De Man, B. (2020). Deep learning for tomographic image reconstruction. Nature Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-020-00273-z