Medical image segmentation automatic quality control: A multi-dimensional approach
Open accessAbstract
In clinical applications, using erroneous segmentations of medical images can have dramatic consequences. Current approaches dedicated to medical image segmentation automatic quality control do not predict segmentation quality at slice-level (2D), resulting in sub-optimal evaluations. Our 2D-based deep learning method simultaneously performs quality control at 2D-level and 3D-level for cardiovascular MR image segmentations. We compared it with 3D approaches by training both on 36,540 (2D) / 3842 (3D) samples to predict Dice Similarity Coefficients (DSC) for 4 different structures from the left ventricle, i.e., trabeculations (LVT), myocardium (LVM), papillary muscles (LVPM) and blood (LVC). The 2D-based method outperformed the 3D method. At the 2D-level, the mean absolute errors (MAEs) of the DSC predictions for 3823 samples, were 0.02, 0.02, 0.05 and 0.02 for LVM, LVC, LVT and LVPM, respectively. At the 3D-level, for 402 samples, the corresponding MAEs were 0.02, 0.01, 0.02 and 0.04. The method was validated in a clinical practice evaluation against semi-qualitative scores provided by expert cardiologists for 1016 subjects of the UK BioBank. Finally, we provided evidence that a multi-level QC could be used to enhance clinical measurements derived from image segmentations.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fournel et al. (2021) showed the superiority of a 2D regression network compared to 3D network for quality estimation.
“Fournel et al. (2021) showed the superiority of a 2D regression network compared to 3D network for quality estimation.”
From SegQC: a segmentation network-based framework for multi-metric segmentation quality control and segmentation error detection in volumetric medical images (2024) · cites this paper as Fournel et al., 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
Reverse Classification Accuracy: Predicting Segmentation Performance in the Absence of Ground Truth
Valindria, V. V., Lavdas, I., Bai, W., Kamnitsas, K., Aboagye, E. O., Rockall, A. G., Rueckert, D., & Glocker, B. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2017.2665165 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Audelan, B., Delingette, H., 2019. Unsupervised quality control of image segmentation based on bayesian learning. MICCAI 2019, Lect. Notes in Comp. Sc. 11765.
- Baumgartner C.F., Koch L.M., P.M.K.E., 2018. An exploration of 2d and 3d deep learning techniques for cardiac mr image segmen- tation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer 10663.
- Bricq, S., Frandon, J., Bernard, M., Guye, M., Finas, M., Marcadet, L., Miquerol, L., Kober, F., Habib, G., Fagret, D., Jacquier, A., Lalande, A., 2015. Semiautomatic detection of myocardial con- tours in order to investigate normal values of the left ventricular trabeculated mass using mri. Journal of magnetic resonance imag- ing : JMRI 43.
- Frandon, J., Bricq, S., Bentatou, Z., Marcadet, L., Barral, P., Fi- nas, M., Fagret, D., Kober, F., Habib, G., Bernard, M., Lalande, A., Miquerol, L., Jacquier, A., 2018. Semi-automatic detection of myocardial trabeculation using cardiovascular magnetic reso- nance: Correlation with histology and reproducibility in a mouse model of non-compaction. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 20.
- Japp, A., Gulati, A., Cook, S., Cowie, M., Prasad, S., 2016. The diagnosis and evaluation of dilated cardiomyopathy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 67, 2996-3010.
- Petersen, S.E., Selvanayagam, J.B., Wiesmann, F., Robson, M.D., Francis, J.M., Anderson, R.H., Watkins, H., Neubauer, S., 2005. Left ventricular non-compaction: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 46, 101-105.
- Robinson, R., Valindria, V., Bai, W., Oktay, O., Kainz, B., Suzuki, H., Sanghvi, M., Aung, N., Paiva, J., Zemrak, F., Fung, K., Lukaschuk, E., Lee, A., Carapella, V., Kim, Y., Piechnik, S., Neubauer, S., Petersen, S., Page, C., Glocker, B., 2019. Au- tomated quality control in image segmentation: Application to the uk biobank cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 21, 1597-1606.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Specktor-Fadida, B., Ben-Sira, L., Ben-Bashat, D., & Joskowicz, L. (2024) · arXiv · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Xu, W., Xie, Y., Zhang, X., & Li, W. (2022) · Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine · doi:10.1155/2022/2182931 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Yazdan-Panah, A., Stankoff, B., & Colliot, O. (2024) · Medical Imaging 2024: Image Processing · doi:10.1117/12.3006580 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
ConfIC-RCA: Statistically Grounded Efficient Estimation of Segmentation Quality
Cosarinsky, M., Billot, R., Mansilla, L., Jimenez, G., Gaggión, N., Fu, G., Tirer, T., & Ferrante, E. (2025) · arXiv
“Additionally, a CNN-based approach was developed for automated quality control of left ventricle segmentation in cardiac MRI [24].”
- Authors
- Fournel, J., Bartoli, A., Bendahan, D., Guye, M., Bernard, M., Rauseo, E., Khanji, M. Y., Petersen, S. E., Jacquier, A., & Ghattas, B.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Hôpital de la Timone (FR)
- St Bartholomew's Hospital (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fournel, Joris
- ORCID
- Venue
- Medical Image Analysis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-12
- Volume
- 74
- Pages
- 102213
- ISSN
- 1361-8415 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3195072348
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 2.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (am, 268 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- Medical Image Analysis (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- NIHR
- British Heart Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
- Keywords
- medical image segmentation, automated quality control, cardiovascular MRI, left ventricle segmentation, trabeculation, myocardium, papillary muscle, blood volume, UK Biobank
- MeSH terms
- Heart, Heart Ventricles, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Imaging, Three-Dimensional
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review