The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Semi-supervised medical image segmentation via uncertainty rectified pyramid consistency
Abstract
Despite that Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have achieved promising performance in many medical image segmentation tasks, they rely on a large set of labeled images for training, which is expensive and time-consuming to acquire. Semi-supervised learning has shown the potential to alleviate this challenge by learning from a large set of unlabeled images and limited labeled samples. In this work, we present a simple yet efficient consistency regularization approach for semi-supervised medical image segmentation, called Uncertainty Rectified Pyramid Consistency (URPC). Inspired by the pyramid feature network, we chose a pyramid-prediction network that obtains a set of segmentation predictions at different scales. For semi-supervised learning, URPC learns from unlabeled data by minimizing the discrepancy between each of the pyramid predictions and their average. We further present multi-scale uncertainty rectification to boost the pyramid consistency regularization, where the rectification seeks to temper the consistency loss at outlier pixels that may have substantially different predictions than the average, potentially due to upsampling errors or lack of enough labeled data. Experiments on two public datasets and an in-house clinical dataset showed that: 1) URPC can achieve large performance improvement by utilizing unlabeled data and 2) Compared with five existing semi-supervised methods, URPC achieved better or comparable results with a simpler pipeline. Furthermore, we build a semi-supervised medical image segmentation codebase to boost research on this topic: https://github.com/HiLab-git/SSL4MIS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation
Long, J., Shelhamer, E., & Darrell, T. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298965 · Cited by 38,834
End-to-End Object Detection with Transformers
Carion, N., Massa, F., Synnaeve, G., Usunier, N., Kirillov, A., & Zagoruyko, S. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.12872 · Cited by 18,253
V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentation
Milletari, F., Navab, N., & Ahmadi, S.-A. (2016) · 2016 Fourth International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) · doi:10.1109/3dv.2016.79 · Cited by 11,931
nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation
Isensee, F., Jaeger, P. F., Kohl, S. A. A., Petersen, J., & Maier-Hein, K. H. (2021) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-020-01008-z · Cited by 10,477
3D U-Net: Learning Dense Volumetric Segmentation from Sparse Annotation
Çiçek, Ö., Abdulkadir, A., Lienkamp, S. S., Brox, T., & Ronneberger, O. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46723-8_49 · Cited by 7,945
The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (BRATS)
Menze, B. H., Jakab, A., Bauer, S., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Farahani, K., Kirby, J., Burren, Y., Porz, N., Slotboom, J., Wiest, R., et al. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2014.2377694 · Cited by 6,781
Dropout as a bayesian approximation: Representing model uncertainty in deep learning
Gal, Y., & Ghahramani, Z. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.02142 · Cited by 6,471
UNet++: Redesigning Skip Connections to Exploit Multiscale Features in Image Segmentation
Zhou, Z., Siddiquee, M. M. R., Tajbakhsh, N., & Liang, J. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2019.2959609 · Cited by 4,402
FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidence
Sohn, K., Berthelot, D., Li, C.-L., Zhang, Z., Carlini, N., Cubuk, E. D., Kurakin, A., Zhang, H., & Raffel, C. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.07685 · Cited by 2,892
Attention gated networks: learning to leverage salient regions in medical images
Schlemper, J., Oktay, O., Schaap, M., Heinrich, M., Kainz, B., Glocker, B., & Rueckert, D. (2019) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2019.01.012 · Cited by 2,014
Metadata
- Authors
- Luo, X., Wang, G., Liao, W., Chen, J., Song, T., Chen, Y., Zhang, S., Metaxas, D. N., & Zhang, S.
- Venue
- Medical Image Analysis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-08
- Volume
- 80
- Pages
- 102517
- ISSN
- 1361-8415 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4282935002
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 26.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Semi-supervised medical image segmentation via uncertainty rectified pyramid consistency. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.media.2022.102517
- The paper
- Luo, X., Wang, G., Liao, W., Chen, J., Song, T., Chen, Y., Zhang, S., Metaxas, D. N., & Zhang, S. (2022). Semi-supervised medical image segmentation via uncertainty rectified pyramid consistency. Medical Image Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2022.102517
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.