The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mutual consistency learning for semi-supervised medical image segmentation
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we propose a novel mutual consistency network (MC-Net+) to effectively exploit the unlabeled data for semi-supervised medical image segmentation. The MC-Net+ model is motivated by the observation that deep models trained with limited annotations are prone to output highly uncertain and easily mis-classified predictions in the ambiguous regions (e.g., adhesive edges or thin branches) for medical image segmentation. Leveraging these challenging samples can make the semi-supervised segmentation model training more effective. Therefore, our proposed MC-Net+ model consists of two new designs. First, the model contains one shared encoder and multiple slightly different decoders (i.e., using different up-sampling strategies). The statistical discrepancy of multiple decoders' outputs is computed to denote the model's uncertainty, which indicates the unlabeled hard regions. Second, we apply a novel mutual consistency constraint between one decoder's probability output and other decoders' soft pseudo labels. In this way, we minimize the discrepancy of multiple outputs (i.e., the model uncertainty) during training and force the model to generate invariant results in such challenging regions, aiming at regularizing the model training. We compared the segmentation results of our MC-Net+ model with five state-of-the-art semi-supervised approaches on three public medical datasets. Extension experiments with two standard semi-supervised settings demonstrate the superior performance of our model over other methods, which sets a new state of the art for semi-supervised medical image segmentation. Our code is released publicly at https://github.com/ycwu1997/MC-Net.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
(1993) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.1993 · Cited by 17,667
V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentation
Milletari, F., Navab, N., & Ahmadi, S.-A. (2016) · 2016 Fourth International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) · doi:10.1109/3dv.2016.79 · Cited by 11,931
Dropout as a bayesian approximation: Representing model uncertainty in deep learning
Gal, Y., & Ghahramani, Z. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.02142 · Cited by 6,471
The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): Maintaining and Operating a Public Information Repository
Clark, K., Vendt, B., Smith, K., Freymann, J., Kirby, J., Koppel, P., Moore, S., Phillips, S., Maffitt, D., Pringle, M., et al. (2013) · Journal of Digital Imaging · doi:10.1007/s10278-013-9622-7 · Cited by 4,599
A review of uncertainty quantification in deep learning: Techniques, applications and challenges
Abdar, M., Pourpanah, F., Hussain, S., Rezazadegan, D., Liu, L., Ghavamzadeh, M., Fieguth, P., Cao, X., Khosravi, A., Acharya, U. R., et al. (2021) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2021.05.008 · Cited by 3,111 · cited 2×
“The uncertainty analysis attracts much attention in the both fields of machine learning and computer vision (Abdar et al., 2021; Jungo and Reyes, 2019).”
BackgroundFixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidence
Sohn, K., Berthelot, D., Li, C.-L., Zhang, Z., Carlini, N., Cubuk, E. D., Kurakin, A., Zhang, H., & Raffel, C. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.07685 · Cited by 2,892
Virtual Adversarial Training: A Regularization Method for Supervised and Semi-Supervised Learning
Miyato, T., Maeda, S.-I., Koyama, M., & Ishii, S. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2018.2858821 · Cited by 2,843
Bernard, O., Lalande, A., Zotti, C., Cervenansky, F., Yang, X., Heng, P.-A., Cetin, I., Lekadir, K., Camara, O., Gonzalez Ballester, M. A., et al. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2018.2837502 · Cited by 2,431
Deep Learning Techniques for Medical Image Segmentation: Achievements and Challenges
Hesamian, M. H., Jia, W., He, X., & Kennedy, P. (2019) · Journal of Digital Imaging · doi:10.1007/s10278-019-00227-x · Cited by 1,631
Zheng, Z., & Yang, Y. (2021) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-020-01395-y · Cited by 545
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, Y., Ge, Z., Zhang, D., Xu, M., Zhang, L., Xia, Y., & Cai, J.
- Venue
- Medical Image Analysis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-10
- Volume
- 81
- Pages
- 102530
- ISSN
- 1361-8415 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4285040393
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 26.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mutual consistency learning for semi-supervised medical image segmentation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.media.2022.102530
- The paper
- Wu, Y., Ge, Z., Zhang, D., Xu, M., Zhang, L., Xia, Y., & Cai, J. (2022). Mutual consistency learning for semi-supervised medical image segmentation. Medical Image Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2022.102530
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.