Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 394

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mutual consistency learning for semi-supervised medical image segmentation

Open access
Wu, Yicheng, Ge, Zongyuan, Zhang, Donghao, Xu, Minfeng, Zhang, Lei, Xia, Yong, Cai, Jianfei·2022·Medical Image Analysis

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a novel mutual consistency network (MC-Net+) to effectively exploit the unlabeled data for semi-supervised medical image segmentation. The MC-Net+ model is motivated by the observation that deep models trained with limited annotations are prone to output highly uncertain and easily mis-classified predictions in the ambiguous regions (e.g., adhesive edges or thin branches) for medical image segmentation. Leveraging these challenging samples can make the semi-supervised segmentation model training more effective. Therefore, our proposed MC-Net+ model consists of two new designs. First, the model contains one shared encoder and multiple slightly different decoders (i.e., using different up-sampling strategies). The statistical discrepancy of multiple decoders' outputs is computed to denote the model's uncertainty, which indicates the unlabeled hard regions. Second, we apply a novel mutual consistency constraint between one decoder's probability output and other decoders' soft pseudo labels. In this way, we minimize the discrepancy of multiple outputs (i.e., the model uncertainty) during training and force the model to generate invariant results in such challenging regions, aiming at regularizing the model training. We compared the segmentation results of our MC-Net+ model with five state-of-the-art semi-supervised approaches on three public medical datasets. Extension experiments with two standard semi-supervised settings demonstrate the superior performance of our model over other methods, which sets a new state of the art for semi-supervised medical image segmentation. Our code is released publicly at https://github.com/ycwu1997/MC-Net.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.media.2022.102530

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Metadata

Authors
Wu, Y., Ge, Z., Zhang, D., Xu, M., Zhang, L., Xia, Y., & Cai, J.
Venue
Medical Image Analysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-10
Volume
81
Pages
102530
ISSN
1361-8415 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4285040393
Cited by
394
References
21
FWCI
26.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mutual consistency learning for semi-supervised medical image segmentation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.media.2022.102530
The paper
Wu, Y., Ge, Z., Zhang, D., Xu, M., Zhang, L., Xia, Y., & Cai, J. (2022). Mutual consistency learning for semi-supervised medical image segmentation. Medical Image Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2022.102530

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.