Cited by 12Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesAdvanced Neural Network Applications3D Shape Modeling and Analysis

Anatomically plausible segmentations: Explicitly preserving topology through prior deformations

Open access
Wyburd, Madeleine K., Dinsdale, Nicola K., Jenkinson, Mark, Namburete, Ana I.L.·2024·Medical Image Analysis

Abstract

Since the rise of deep learning, new medical segmentation methods have rapidly been proposed with extremely promising results, often reporting marginal improvements on the previous state-of-the-art (SOTA) method. However, on visual inspection errors are often revealed, such as topological mistakes (e.g. holes or folds), that are not detected using traditional evaluation metrics. Incorrect topology can often lead to errors in clinically required downstream image processing tasks. Therefore, there is a need for new methods to focus on ensuring segmentations are topologically correct. In this work, we present TEDS-Net: a segmentation network that preserves anatomical topology whilst maintaining segmentation performance that is competitive with SOTA baselines. Further, we show how current SOTA segmentation methods can introduce problematic topological errors. TEDS-Net achieves anatomically plausible segmentation by using learnt topology-preserving fields to deform a prior. Traditionally, topology-preserving fields are described in the continuous domain and begin to break down when working in the discrete domain. Here, we introduce additional modifications that more strictly enforce topology preservation. We illustrate our method on an open-source medical heart dataset, performing both single and multi-structure segmentation, and show that the generated fields contain no folding voxels, which corresponds to full topology preservation on individual structures whilst vastly outperforming the other baselines on overall scene topology. The code is available at: https://github.com/mwyburd/TEDS-Net.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.media.2024.103222

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All model implementations and predictions follow the descriptions provided in [6].

    “All model implementations and predictions follow the descriptions provided in [6].”

    From rNCA: Self-Repairing Segmentation Masks (2025) · cites this paper as [6]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Dinsdale NK Jenkinson M Namburete AI Spatial warping network for 3d segmentation of the hippocampus in mr images MICCAI Springer 2019 284 291
  2. Shit S Paetzold JC Sekuboyina A Ezhov I Unger A Zhylka A Pluim JP Bauer U Menze BH Cldice-a novel topology-preserving loss function for tubular structure segmentation Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2021 16560 16569

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wyburd, M. K., Dinsdale, N. K., Jenkinson, M., & Namburete, A. I. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (GB)
Corresponding author
Wyburd, Madeleine K.
Venue
Medical Image Analysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-10
Volume
97
Pages
103222
ISSN
1361-8415 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399708533
Cited by
11
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 3
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Image Analysis (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  • Academy of Medical Sciences
  • NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
  • Royal Academy of Engineering
  • NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre
  • Medical Research Council (EP/L016052/1)
  • Wellcome Trust (215573/Z/19/Z, 203139/Z/16/Z)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Keywords
medical image segmentation, topology preservation, cardiac image segmentation, segmentation errors
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Algorithms, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review