The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the cusp: Considering the impact of artificial intelligence language models in healthcare
Open accessAbstract
Goodman et al. discuss how AI technologies like the natural language processing model Chat-GPT could potentially transform healthcare through knowledge dissemination and personalized patient education. Before these tools can be safely integrated into healthcare, research and development of robust oversight mechanisms are necessary to ensure their accuracy and reliability.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Kung, T. H., Cheatham, M., Medenilla, A., Sillos, C., De Leon, L., Elepaño, C., Madriaga, M., Aggabao, R., Diaz-Candido, G., Maningo, J., et al. (2023) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198 · Cited by 4,115
Sezgın, E., Sirrianni, J., & Linwood, S. L. (2022) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/32875 · Cited by 129
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Large Language Models in Medical Education: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions
Abd-alrazaq, A., AlSaad, R., Alhuwail, D., Ahmed, A., Healy, P. M., Latifi, S., Aziz, S., Damseh, R., Alabed Alrazak, S., & Sheikh, J. (2023) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/48291 · Cited by 722
“LLMs have the potential to significantly impact all phases of medical education programs, offering numerous benefits in various aspects, including curriculum planning, delivery, assessments, programmatic enhancements, and research [8-30].”
BackgroundJohnson, D., Goodman, R., Patrinely, J., Stone, C., Zimmerman, E., Donald, R., Chang, S., Berkowitz, S., Finn, A., Jahangir, E., et al. (2023) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2566942/v1 · Cited by 598
Self-citationEthical Considerations of Using ChatGPT in Health Care
Wang, C., Liu, S., Yang, H., Guo, J., Wu, Y., & Liu, J. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/48009 · Cited by 541
“The current regulatory landscape for AI is still evolving [38], with ongoing efforts to establish more rigorous oversight mechanisms [39].”
Accuracy and Reliability of Chatbot Responses to Physician Questions
Goodman, R. S., Patrinely, J. R., Stone, C. A., Zimmerman, E., Donald, R. R., Chang, S. S., Berkowitz, S. T., Finn, A. P., Jahangir, E., Scoville, E. A., et al. (2023) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.36483 · Cited by 484
Self-citationChatGPT in healthcare: A taxonomy and systematic review
Li, J., Dada, A., Puladi, B., Kleesiek, J., & Egger, J. (2024) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108013 · Cited by 452
Metadata
- Authors
- Goodman, R. S., Patrinely, J. R., Osterman, T., Wheless, L., & Johnson, D. B.
- Affiliations
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Johnson, Douglas B.
- Venue
- Med
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-03
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 139-140
- ISSN
- 2666-6340 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4323835279
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 27
- FWCI
- 3.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Med (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA227481)
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Incyte
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in healthcare, large language models, ChatGPT, natural language processing, personalized patient education, knowledge dissemination, human oversight of AI
- MeSH terms
- Artificial Intelligence, Delivery of Health Care, Health Facilities, Humans, Natural Language Processing, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
