The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards a new model of understanding – The triple network, psychopathology and the structure of the mind
Abstract
With progress in neurosciences, neuroimaging and brain stimulation techniques, mental illnesses are now being seen as development anomalies at the molecular-structural level of synapses, resulting in abnormal cross wiring in areas responsible for complex cognitive and emotional processing. These include the multimodal association cortices situated in the prefrontal lobes, the insula in the temporal lobes, midline cortical structures, and their connections to the thalamus, amygdala and the basal ganglia. Three key networks have been identified which are considered the brain hubs for complex perceptual, emotional and behavior processing as well as introspection, theory of mind and self-awareness; namely the salience network (SN), the central executive network (CEN) and the default mode network (DMN). They function in an interconnected manner and involve in higher information processing of the entire internal and external milieu of the organism to determine the behavior strategies to be adopted. A triple network model of aberrant saliency mapping and cognitive dysfunction in psychopathology has been put forward recently and an attempt is being made to understand core cognitive networks and their dysfunction across multiple disorders including schizophrenia, depression, anxiety, autism and dementia. Against this background, the author would like to take the triple network dysfunction model a step further to hypothesize the following. 1. All or some of the three core networks (CEN, SN & DMN) are affected variably in psychiatric disorders, the severity and the nature of the clinical symptoms depending upon the degree of damage and the number of networks that are dysfunctional and whether that dysfunction is reversible or permanent. For example, in a condition like schizophrenia, all three networks would more or less be affected giving rise to plethora of symptoms like executive deficits, negative symptoms, abnormal salience and mood states. In milder conditions like anxiety and depressive disorders, on the other hand, the dysfunction is of a lesser degree and reversible. 2. These networks are the final common pathway through which a variety of internal or environment insults to the brains may act, the degree of damage and reversibility being determined by the critical period of brain development in which these occur. 3. The harmonious functioning of these core networks is what gives rise to the complex phenomenon of the mind in the brain.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The central tenet of this theory is that the sensorial, cognitive, affective, and behavioural dysfunctions associated with mental illnesses are the result of disruptions within and between the c-ICNs.”
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
American Psychiatric Association (2013) · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 · Cited by 116,369
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,845
An Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function
Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167 · Cited by 12,803
A default mode of brain function
Raichle, M. E., MacLeod, A. M., Snyder, A. Z., Powers, W. J., Gusnard, D. A., & Shulman, G. L. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.676 · Cited by 12,190
Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control
Seeley, W. W., Menon, V., Schatzberg, A. F., Keller, J., Glover, G. H., Kenna, H., Reiss, A. L., & Greicius, M. D. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5587-06.2007 · Cited by 7,426
Insel, T., Cuthbert, B., Garvey, M., Heinssen, R., Pine, D. S., Quinn, K., Sanislow, C., & Wang, P. (2010) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09091379 · Cited by 7,067
Large-scale brain networks and psychopathology: a unifying triple network model
Menon, V. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.08.003 · Cited by 4,168
Does Rejection Hurt? An fMRI Study of Social Exclusion
Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Williams, K. D. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1089134 · Cited by 3,849
Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition
Amodio, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1884 · Cited by 3,782 · cited 1×
“Studies in schizophrenia indicate that the patients tend to use suppressive strategies over reappraisal strategies [49-51].”
BackgroundKapur, S. (2003) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.1.13 · Cited by 2,813
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Chalmers, 1995, Facing upto the problem of consciousness, J Consciousness Stud, 2, 200
- Bortolato, 2015, Cognitve dysfunction in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia: a systematic review of meta-anayses, Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat, 11, 31111
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lawrence, K. E., Hernandez, L. M., Bowman, H. C., Padgaonkar, N. T., Fuster, E., Jack, A., Aylward, E., Gaab, N., Horn, J. D. V., Bernier, R., et al. (2020) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhaa105 · Cited by 89
Zhang, R., Lam, C. L. M., Peng, X., Zhang, D., Zhang, C., Huang, R., & Lee, T. M. C. (2021) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.03.026 · Cited by 88
Large-scale lesion symptom mapping of depression identifies brain regions for risk and resilience
Trapp, N. T., Bruss, J., Manzel, K. W., Grafman, J. H., Tranel, D., & Boes, A. D. (2022) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awac361 · Cited by 66
Cotter, D. L., Campbell, C. E., Sukumaran, K., McConnell, R., Berhane, K. T., Schwartz, J. D., Hackman, D. A., Ahmadi, H., Chen, J., & Herting, M. M. (2023) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2023.108001 · Cited by 61
Senova, S., Clair, A.-H., Palfi, S., Yelnik, J., Domenech, P., & Mallet, L. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00905 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Menon, B.
- Corresponding author
- Menon, Bindu
- Venue
- Medical Hypotheses
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 133
- Pages
- 109385
- ISSN
- 0306-9877 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2970056870
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 5.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medical Hypotheses (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- triple network model, salience network, frontoparietal network, default mode network, psychopathology, schizophrenia, depression, anxiety, autism spectrum disorder, dementia, cognitive impairment, brain development, structure of the mind, theory of mind, self-awareness, executive deficits, negative symptoms
- MeSH terms
- Attention, Behavior, Mental Disorders, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Hallucinations, Humans, Mental Processes, Models, Neurological, Models, Psychological, Nerve Net, Psychophysiology, Schizophrenic Psychology, Self Concept, Thinking, Executive Function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review