The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Retention of a wide variety of organic pollutants by different nanofiltration/reverse osmosis membranes: controlling parameters of process
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ultrathin Graphene Nanofiltration Membrane for Water Purification
Han, Y., Xu, Z., & Gao, C. (2013) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201202601 · Cited by 1,607
Factors affecting the rejection of organic solutes during NF/RO treatment—a literature review
Bellona, C., Drewes, J. E., Xu, P., & Amy, G. (2004) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2004.03.034 · Cited by 1,077
Fate of antibiotics during municipal water recycling treatment processes
Le-Minh, N., Khan, S. J., Drewes, J. E., & Stuetz, R. M. (2010) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2010.06.020 · Cited by 778
Liu, Z.-H., Kanjo, Y., & Mizutani, S. (2009) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.08.039 · Cited by 729
Graphene membranes for water desalination
Homaeigohar, S., & Elbahri, M. (2017) · NPG Asia Materials · doi:10.1038/am.2017.135 · Cited by 444
Metadata
- Authors
- Agenson, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Membrane Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-11-01
- Volume
- 225
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 91-103
- ISSN
- 0376-7388 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2035191481
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Retention of a wide variety of organic pollutants by different nanofiltration/reverse osmosis membranes: controlling parameters of process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.memsci.2003.08.006
- The paper
- Agenson, K. (2003). Retention of a wide variety of organic pollutants by different nanofiltration/reverse osmosis membranes: controlling parameters of process. Journal of Membrane Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2003.08.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
