The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computational analysis of transport phenomena in proton exchange membrane for polymer electrolyte fuel cells
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Models that focus on conditions of vapour equilibration, especially those based on the Springer model and its transient extension, may ignore pressure gradients altogether [39,124,145].”
From Modelling the Proton-Conductive Membrane in Practical Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC) Simulation: A Review (2020) · cites this paper as [145]
Citations
Cites
Transport in Polymer-Electrolyte Membranes
Weber, A. Z., & Newman, J. (2003) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.1580822 · Cited by 411
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Springer, 1991, Polymer electrolyte fuel cell model, J. Electrochem. Soc., 138, 2334, 10.1149/1.2085971 · DOI · Paper page
- Bernadi, 1992, A mathematical model of solid-polymer-electrolyte fuel cell, J. Electrochem. Soc., 139, 2477, 10.1149/1.2221251 · DOI · Paper page
- Um, 2004, Three-dimensional analysis of transport and electrochemical reactions in polymer electrolyte fuel cells, J. Power Sources, 125, 40, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.07.007 · DOI
- Mazumder, 2003, Rigorous 3-D mathematical modeling of PEM fuel cells. II. Model predictions with liquid water transport, J. Electrochem. Soc., 150, A1510, 10.1149/1.1615609 · DOI
- Shimpalee, 2004, Predicting water and current distributions in a commercial-size PEMFC, J. Power Sources, 135, 79, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.03.059 · DOI
- Mench, 2003, In situ current distribution measurements in polymer electrolyte fuel cells, J. Electrochem. Soc., 158, A1052, 10.1149/1.1584440 · DOI
- Choi, 2003, Sorption in proton-exchange membranes, J. Electrochem. Soc., 150, E601, 10.1149/1.1623495 · DOI
- C.-S. Lee, Modeling and Simulation of Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells with Gas-Dissolved Ionomer Layer on Catalyst Particles, Ph. D. Thesis, The Hanyang University, February 2006.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dickinson, E. J. F., & Smith, G. (2020) · Membranes · doi:10.3390/membranes10110310 · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- Jung, C.-Y., Lee, C.-S., & Yi, S.-C.
- Affiliations
- Hanyang University (KR)
- Samsung (South Korea) (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Yi, Sung-Chul
- Venue
- Journal of Membrane Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 309
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 1-6
- ISSN
- 0376-7388 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2068545770
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Membrane Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques
- Keywords
- proton exchange membrane fuel cells, proton exchange membranes, gas-phase transport, catalyst layer, water transport, membrane thickness, water content distribution, current density distribution, mathematical modeling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review