Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 345

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Selective removal of divalent cations by polyelectrolyte multilayer nanofiltration membrane: Role of polyelectrolyte charge, ion size, and ionic strength

Open access
Cheng, Wei, Liu, Caihong, Tong, Tiezheng, Epsztein, Razi, Sun, Meng, Verduzco, Rafael, Ma, Jun, Elimelech, Menachem·2018·Journal of Membrane Science

Abstract

Abstract We fabricated polyelectrolyte multilayer (PEM) nanofiltration (NF) membranes using a layer-by-layer (LbL) method for effective removal of scale-forming divalent cations (Mg2+, Ca2+, Sr2+, and Ba2+) from feedwaters with different salinities. Two polymers with opposite charges, polycation (poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride), PDADMAC) and polyanion (poly(sodium 4-styrenesulfonate), PSS), were sequentially deposited on a commercial polyamide NF membrane to form a PEM. Compared to pristine and PSS-terminated membranes, PDADMAC-terminated membranes demonstrated much higher rejection of divalent cations and selectivity for sodium transport over divalent cations (Na+/X2+) due to a combination of both Donnan- and size-exclusion effects. A PDADMAC-terminated membrane with 5.5 bilayers exhibited 97% rejection of Mg2+ with selectivity (Na+/Mg2+) greater than 30. We attribute the order of cation rejection (Mg2+ > Ca2+ > Sr2+ > Ba2+) to the ionic size, which governs both the hydration radius and hydration energy of the cations. The ionic strength (salinity) of the feed solution had a significant influence on both water flux and cation rejection of PEM membranes. In feed solutions with high ionic strength, abundant NaCl salt screened the charge of the polyelectrolytes and led to swelling of the multilayers, resulting in decreased selectivity (Na+/X2+) and increased water permeability. The fabricated PEM membranes can be potentially applied to the pretreatment of mild-salinity brackish waters to reduce membrane scaling in the main desalination stage.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.04.052

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 345

Metadata

Authors
Cheng, W., Liu, C., Tong, T., Epsztein, R., Sun, M., Verduzco, R., Ma, J., & Elimelech, M.
Venue
Journal of Membrane Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
559
Pages
98-106
ISSN
0376-7388 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2799492176
Cited by
345
References
1
FWCI
13.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selective removal of divalent cations by polyelectrolyte multilayer nanofiltration membrane: Role of polyelectrolyte charge, ion size, and ionic strength. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.04.052
The paper
Cheng, W., Liu, C., Tong, T., Epsztein, R., Sun, M., Verduzco, R., Ma, J., & Elimelech, M. (2018). Selective removal of divalent cations by polyelectrolyte multilayer nanofiltration membrane: Role of polyelectrolyte charge, ion size, and ionic strength. Journal of Membrane Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.04.052

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.