Cited by 171Food composition and propertiesDiet, Metabolism, and DiseaseNutritional Studies and Diet

Refined grain consumption and the metabolic syndrome in urban Asian Indians (Chennai Urban Rural Epidemiology Study 57)

Radhika, Ganesan, Van Dam, Rob M., Sudha, Vasudevan, Ganesan, Anbazhagan, Mohan, Viswanathan·2009·Metabolism

Abstract

The objective of the study was to evaluate the association of refined grains consumption with insulin resistance and the metabolic syndrome in an urban south Indian population. The study population comprised 2042 individuals aged > or = 20 years randomly selected from the Chennai Urban Rural Epidemiology Study (CURES), a cross-sectional study on a representative population of Chennai, southern India. The metabolic syndrome was defined according to modified Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines; and insulin resistance, by the homeostasis assessment model. The mean refined grain intake was 333 g/d (46.9% of total calories) in this population. After adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, metabolic equivalent, total energy intake, and other dietary factors, higher refined grain intake was significantly associated with higher waist circumference (8% higher for the highest vs the lowest quartile, P for trend < .0001), systolic blood pressure (2.9%, P for trend < .0001), diastolic blood pressure (1.7%, P for trend = .03), fasting blood glucose (7.9%, P for trend = .007), serum triglyceride (36.5%, P for trend < .0001), low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-10.1%, P for trend < .0001), and insulin resistance (13.6%, P < .001). Compared with participants in the bottom quartile, participants who were in the highest quartile of refined grain intake were significantly more likely to have the metabolic syndrome (odds ratio, 7.83; 95% confidence interval, 4.72-12.99). Higher intake of refined grains was associated with insulin resistance and the metabolic syndrome in this population of Asian Indians who habitually consume high-carbohydrate diets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.metabol.2009.01.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 171

Authors
Radhika, G., Van Dam, R. M., Sudha, V., Ganesan, A., & Mohan, V.
Affiliations
Madras Diabetes Research Foundation (IN)
Corresponding author
Mohan, Viswanathan
Venue
Metabolism
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05
Volume
58
Issue
5
Pages
675-681
ISSN
0026-0495 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077455361
Cited by
171
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, Asian Indians, waist circumference, blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, serum triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, high-carbohydrate diet, dietary risk factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Anthropometry, Blood Glucose, Blood Pressure, Edible Grain, Cholesterol, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diet, Female, Humans, India, Insulin Resistance, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Triglycerides, Urban Population, Metabolic Syndrome, Waist Circumference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review