Cited by 76Fungal Infections and StudiesAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityBacterial Infections and Vaccines

A titanic drug resistance threat in Cryptococcus neoformans

Open access
Zafar, Hanna, Altamirano, Sophie, Ballou, Elizabeth R, Nielsen, Kirsten·2019·Current Opinion in Microbiology

Abstract

Increasing resistance to frontline antifungals is a growing threat to global health. In the face of high rates of relapse for patients with cryptococcal meningitis and frequent drug resistance in clinical isolates, recent insights into Cryptococcus neoformans morphogenesis and genome plasticity take on new and urgent meaning. Here we review the state of the understanding of mechanisms of drug resistance in the context of host-relevant changes in Cryptococcus morphology and cell ploidy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mib.2019.11.001

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 84 · Cited by 76

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]O’Neill J Tackling Drug-Resistance Infections Globally: A Final Report and Recommendations InReview on Antimicrobial Resistance 2016 Wellcome Trust, London, UK https://amr-review.org/.

Authors
Zafar, H., Altamirano, S., Ballou, E. R., & Nielsen, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
  • Ballou, Elizabeth R
  • Nielsen, Kirsten
Venue
Current Opinion in Microbiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-12
Volume
52
Pages
158-164
ISSN
1369-5274 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2991039487
Cited by
76
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01AI134636, K12GM119955)
  • Royal Society (R01AI134636)
  • Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (K12GM119955)
  • Society of Interventional Radiology
  • Wellcome Trust (211241/Z/18/Z)
  • National Centre for the Replacement Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC/R001472/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
Keywords
Cryptococcus neoformans, antifungal resistance, cryptococcal meningitis, morphogenesis, genome plasticity, cell ploidy, relapse, host-pathogen interaction
MeSH terms
Antifungal Agents, Cryptococcosis, Cryptococcus neoformans, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Respiratory Tract Infections, Meningitis, Cryptococcal, Drug Resistance, Multiple, Fungal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review