Cited by 100Microplastics and Plastic PollutionEnvironmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyAquaculture disease management and microbiota

Polystyrene nano/microplastics induce microbiota dysbiosis, oxidative damage, and innate immune disruption in zebrafish.

Pei, Xin, Heng, Xing, Chu, Weihua·2022·Microbial Pathogenesis

Abstract

The toxicity of polystyrene nano/microplastics with diameter sizes of 50um and 100 nm and concentrations of 100 and 1000 μg/mL on gut microbiota, antioxidant activity and innate immune response in zebrafish was investigated. After exposure to polystyrene plastics particle, the pathological morphological changes of intestine and gills were observed, and the injury severity was related to the concentration and particle size of plastics. Significant changes in the richness and diversity of gut microbiota were observed after polystyrene plastics-exposed in zebrafish. The plastics-treated groups exhibited more substantial oxidative stress than the control group. In addition, the mRNA expression level of most pro- and anti-inflammatory factors, including IL-8, NF-κb, and IL-10, increased while the mRNA expression of TNF-α, a pro-inflammatory factor, decreased. Our results suggest that polystyrene nano/microplastics may represent a potential threat to the gut microbiota, oxidative status, and innate immunity. These results indicated that polystyrene nano/microplastics exerted size and concentration-dependent toxicity on zebrafish. The findings provide new evidence for the toxicity of polystyrene plastics on zebrafish.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.micpath.2021.105387

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Extensive research has investigated the toxic effects of polystyrene nanoparticles on aquatic organisms, primarily focusing on oxidative stress and inflammation.

    “Extensive research has investigated the toxic effects of polystyrene nanoparticles on aquatic organisms, primarily focusing on oxidative stress and inflammation (Feng et al., 2022; Pei et al., 2022; Wu et al., 2022).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pei, X., Heng, X., & Chu, W.
Affiliations
China Pharmaceutical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Chu, Weihua
Venue
Microbial Pathogenesis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-02
Volume
163
Pages
105387
ISSN
0882-4010 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4205942374
Cited by
100
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 9
FWCI
4.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Microbial Pathogenesis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Aquaculture disease management and microbiota
Keywords
polystyrene, microplastics, nanoplastics, gut dysbiosis, oxidative stress, innate immunity, zebrafish, intestinal injury, inflammatory cytokines, NF-κB, TNF-α, IL-10, interleukin-8
MeSH terms
Microplastics, Animals, Immunity, Innate, Plastics, Polystyrenes, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Zebrafish, Oxidative Stress, Microbiota, Dysbiosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review