Cited by 22Health Education and ValidationInnovations in Medical EducationHealth and Medical Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

A Rapid Assessment Tool for affirming good practice in midwifery education programming

Open access

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to design a criterion-referenced assessment tool that could be used globally in a rapid assessment of good practices and bottlenecks in midwifery education programs. DESIGN: a standard tool development process was followed, to generate standards and reference criteria; followed by external review and field testing to document psychometric properties. SETTING: review of standards and scoring criteria were conducted by stakeholders around the globe. Field testing of the tool was conducted in Myanmar. PARTICIPANTS: eleven of Myanmar׳s 22 midwifery education programs participated in the assessment. FINDINGS: the clinimetric tool was demonstrated to have content validity and high inter-rater reliability in use. KEY CONCLUSIONS: a globally validated tool, and accompanying user guide and handbook are now available for conducting rapid assessments of compliance with good practice criteria in midwifery education programming.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.midw.2016.01.008

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Solutions to post-conflict delivery of BEmONC are contextual and more likely to be successful in NGO run facilities and with inter-country collaboration to increase SBA capacity.

    “As highlighted by others, solutions to post-conflict delivery of BEmONC are contextual and more likely to be successful in NGO run facilities [48, 49] and with inter-country collaboration to increase SBA capacity [14, 50].”

    From Accelerated Training of Skilled Birth Attendants in a Marginalized Population on the Thai-Myanmar Border: A Multiple Methods Program Evaluation (2016) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Aim of the study describes support for midwifery schools to improve teaching and competency-based learning, which is relevant to increasing skilled birth attendant capacity. The Discussion describes a tool used in several countries, but neither passage says that inter-country collaboration increases that capacity, particularly for post-conflict BEmONC delivery. The NGO-run-facilities clause is attached to other citations, not this source. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Experience in this and other resource poor settings has shown that to achieve quality SBA or midwifery workforce training, collaboration with higher income countries to fund and share expertise was valuable.

    “Experience in this and other resource poor settings has shown that to achieve quality SBA or midwifery workforce training, collaboration with higher income countries to fund and share expertise was valuable [14, 50].”

    From Accelerated Training of Skilled Birth Attendants in a Marginalized Population on the Thai-Myanmar Border: A Multiple Methods Program Evaluation (2016) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Aim of the study (page unavailable) describes a US-based organisation providing expertise and direct support to improve midwifery education. Findings from the field test (page unavailable) says donor efforts support high-quality education in Myanmar. The paper does not establish that higher-income countries funded this training, or that such collaboration was shown to be valuable across other resource-poor settings. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A secondary limitation is lack of an analysis of cost effectiveness of the program.

    “A secondary limitation is lack of an analysis of cost effectiveness of the program [14].”

    From Accelerated Training of Skilled Birth Attendants in a Marginalized Population on the Thai-Myanmar Border: A Multiple Methods Program Evaluation (2016) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Conclusion’s Table 2 lists limitations of the Rapid Assessment Tool, but does not identify a lack of cost-effectiveness analysis. A search for cost-effectiveness and economic evaluation found no passage addressing that proposed limitation; the cost-effectiveness reference is to another study. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 22

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Bergevin, 2015, Towards ending preventable maternal deaths by 2035, Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, 33, 23, 10.1055/s-0034-1395275 · DOI
  2. Bhuinneain, 2015, A systematic review of essential obstetric and newborn care capacity building in rural sub-Saharan Africa, British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 122, 174, 10.1111/1471-0528.13218 · DOI
  3. Campbell, 2014, Human resources for health and universal health coverage: fostering equity and effective coverage, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 91, 853, 10.2471/BLT.13.118729 · DOI
  4. Carvalho, 2013, National and sub-national anlaysis of the health benefits and cost-effectiveness of strategies to reduce maternal mortality in Afghanistan, Health Policy and Planning, 28, 62, 10.1093/heapol/czs026 · DOI
  5. Crowe, 2012, How many births in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia will not be attended by a skilled birth attendant between 2011 and 2015?, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 12, 4, 10.1186/1471-2393-12-4 · DOI
  6. de Vet, 2003, Clinimetrics and psychometrics: two sides of the same coin, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 56, 1146, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.08.010 · DOI
  7. Fava, 2012, Clinimetrics: the science of clinical measurements, International Journal of Clinical Practice, 66, 11, 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02825.x · DOI · Paper page
  8. Feinstein, 1999, Multi-item “instruments” vs. Virginia Apgar׳s principles of clinimetrics, Archives of Internal Medicine, 159, 125, 10.1001/archinte.159.2.125 · DOI
  9. Frenk, 2014, From sovereignty to solidarity: a renewed concept of global health for an era of complex interdependence, Lancet, 383, 94, 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62561-1 · DOI
  10. Frenk, 2010, Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world, Lancet, 376, 1923, 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Germain, 2015, Advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights in low- and middle-income countries: implications for the post-2014 global development agenda, Global Public Health, 10, 137, 10.1080/17441692.2014.986177 · DOI
  12. Hammonds, 2014, The emergence of a global right to health norm – the unresolved case of universal access to quality emergency obstetric care, BMC International Health and Human Rights, 10.1186/1472-698X-14-4 · DOI
  13. Hill, 2014, How can health remain central post-2015 in a sustainable development paradigm?, Globalization and Health, 10, 18, 10.1186/1744-8603-10-18 · DOI
  14. Holmer, 2015, The global met need for emergency obstetric care; a systematic review, British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 122, 183, 10.1111/1471-0528.13230 · DOI
  15. Johnson, 2013, An integrative review and evidence-based conceptual model of the essential components of pre-service education, Human Resources for Health, 11, 42, 10.1186/1478-4491-11-42 · DOI
  16. Laaser, 2014, Global health in the 21st century, Global Health Action, 7, 23694, 10.3402/gha.v7.23694 · DOI
  17. Lomazzi, 2014, The millennium development goals: experiences, achievements and what׳s next, Global Health Action, 7, 23695, 10.3402/gha.v7.23695 · DOI
  18. Montoya, 2014, Explaining differences in maternal mortality levels in sub-Saharan African hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis, International Health, 6, 12, 10.1093/inthealth/iht037 · DOI
  19. Mumtaz, 2015, Good on paper: the gap between programme theory and real-world context in Pakistan׳s Community Midwife programme, British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 122, 249, 10.1111/1471-0528.13112 · DOI
  20. Renfrew, M.J., Homer, C.E.S., Downe. S., 2014. Midwifery – An Executive Summary for The Lancet׳s Series. Available at: 〈http://download.thelancet.com/flat contentassets/series/midwifery/midwifery_exec_sum.pdf〉.
  21. Rosskam, 2014, Increasing skilled birth attendance through midwifery workforce management, International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 28, e62
  22. Ruano, 2014, Health, equity and the post-2015 agenda: raising the voices of marginalized communities, International Journal of Equity in Health, 13, 82, 10.1186/s12939-014-0082-6 · DOI
  23. Turkmani, 2014, Midwives are the backbone of our health system’: lessons from Afghanistan to guide expansion of midwifery in challenging settings, Midwifery, 29, 1166, 10.1016/j.midw.2013.06.015 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Zere, 2013, Equity in reproductive and maternal health services in Bangladesh, International Journal for Equity in Health, 12, 90, 10.1186/1475-9276-12-90 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Fullerton, J. T., Johnson, P., Lobe, E., Myint, K. H., Aung, N. N., Moe, T., & Linn, N. A.
Affiliations
Jhpiego (US)
Corresponding author
Fullerton, Judith T.
Venue
Midwifery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
34
Pages
36-41
ISSN
0266-6138 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2277552300
Cited by
22
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
7.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Midwifery (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
government and the participation of midwifery education programs
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Health Education and Validation
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
Keywords
midwifery education, rapid assessment tool, criterion-referenced assessment, clinimetric properties, content validity, inter-rater reliability, educational program evaluation
MeSH terms
Myanmar, Competency-Based Education, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Female, Humans, Midwifery, Schools, Nursing, Reproducibility of Results, Program Evaluation, Focus Groups, Practice Patterns, Nurses', Checklist

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review