Cited by 41Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsAnesthesia and Pain Management

Vaginal delivery or caesarean section – Severity of early symptoms of postpartum depression and assessment of pain in Polish women in the early puerperium

Ilska, Michalina, Banaś, Ewa, Gregor, Katarzyna, Brandt-Salmeri, Anna, Ilski, Aleksander, Cnota, Wojciech·2020·Midwifery

Abstract

Objectives The primary objective of this study is to examine the differences between women following vaginal delivery and caesarean section (elective or emergency) in terms of early symptoms of postpartum depression, and to evaluate pain during labour and in the early puerperium. An additional goal was to determine if pain evaluation is associated with depressive symptoms. Materials and methods A cross-sectional study was conducted among 224 women in the early puerperium recruited from a public hospital in Poland, who were divided into three groups by method of delivery: caesarean section - elective and emergency, and a vaginal delivery. The measurement tools used in the research were the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). A Pearson correlation analysis, a Student's t-test, a Mann-Whitney U test for independent groups and nonparametric multivariate analyses of variance (Kruskal-Wallis test) were carried out. Results The number of early symptoms of postpartum depression and the level of pain experienced vary depending on type of delivery. Following a caesarean section, women have more early symptoms of depression (M CS = 7.40; SD CS = 5.18 vs M VD = 5.98; SD VD = 4.19; p = 0.03) (especially an emergency CS: Mean rank Em-CS =141.41 vs Mean rank El-CS = 100.94 vs Mean rank VD = 100.93; p CC =126.51 vs Mean rank VD = 84.11; p Em-CS =130.38 vs Mean rank El-CS =123.62 vs Mean rank VD = 84.11; p Conclusions Caesarean section (especially e…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102731

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ilska, M., Banaś, E., Gregor, K., Brandt-Salmeri, A., Ilski, A., & Cnota, W.
Affiliations
  • University of Silesia in Katowice (PL)
  • Medical University of Silesia (PL)
Corresponding author
Ilska, Michalina
Venue
Midwifery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
87
Pages
102731
ISSN
0266-6138 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3022842346
Cited by
41
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4
FWCI
3.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Midwifery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
Keywords
cesarean section, vaginal delivery, emergency cesarean section, early puerperium, postpartum pain, labor pain, mode of delivery, risk factors for postpartum depression, Polish women, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, numerical rating scale, hospital discharge
MeSH terms
Adult, Cesarean Section, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Pain Measurement, Poland, Pregnancy, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Statistics, Nonparametric, Depression, Postpartum, Delivery, Obstetric, Pregnant People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review