Cited by 71Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumPsychometric Methodologies and TestingMental Health Research Topics

The structure of women's mood in the early postpartum

Buttner, Melissa M., O’Hara, Michael W., Watson, David·2012·Assessment

Abstract

The “postpartum blues” is a mild, predictable mood disturbance occurring within the first several days following childbirth. Previous analyses of the “blues” symptom structure yielded inconclusive findings, making reliable assessment a significant methodological limitation. The current study aimed to explicate the symptom structure of women’s mood following childbirth, and to examine psychometric properties of the Daily Experiences Questionnaire (DEQ), an adapted version of the Kennerley Blues Questionnaire that included additional items from the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. Mothers who recently delivered ( N = 216) were recruited from a university hospital and asked to complete mood ratings on six consecutive days using the DEQ. Exploratory factor analysis yielded an interpretable two-factor solution identified as Negative Affect and Positive Affect. Scale reliability indices were excellent, with a high level of agreement in factor structure over time. This two-factor model provides reliable assessment of women’s mood in the early postpartum, informing the study of reproductive-related mood disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1073191111429388

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Negative mood symptoms peak between day 3 and day 5 postpartum, possibly reflecting hormonal readjustments after delivery.

    “Negative mood symptoms have been found to peak between day 3 and day 5 postpartum, perhaps reflecting hormonal readjustments after delivery [49–51].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buttner, M. M., O’Hara, M. W., & Watson, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
Venue
Assessment
Published
2011-12-06
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
247-256
ISSN
  • 1073-1911 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3489
OpenAlex
W2123503763
Cited by
71
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
postpartum blues, postpartum mood, early postpartum period, negative affect, positive affect, PANAS, factor structure, psychometric properties, maternal mood
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Female, Humans, Mental Health, Pregnancy, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Statistics as Topic, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors, United States, Reproducibility of Results, Women's Health, Depression, Postpartum, Mood Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review