Cited by 165

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Simplified CRISPR-Cas genome editing for Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Generoso, Wesley Cardoso, Gottardi, Manuela, Oreb, Mislav, Boles, Eckhard·2016·Journal of Microbiological Methods

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mimet.2016.06.020

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CRISPR-mediated manipulation has been applied to all sorts of cells and some multicellular organisms, such as human cell cultures, mice, plants, and yeasts.

    “Soon, all sorts of cells and some multicellular organisms would be the object of CRISPR-mediated manipulation, such as human cell cultures, mice, plants, yeasts, and the list goes on [62,63,64,65].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Bao, 2015, Homology-integrated CRISPR-Cas (HI-CRISPR) system for one-step multigene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, ACS Synth. Biol., 4, 585, 10.1021/sb500255k · DOI · Paper page
  2. DiCarlo, 2013, Genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using CRISPR-Cas systems, Nucleic Acids Res., 41, 4336, 10.1093/nar/gkt135 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Gibson, 2009, Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases, Nat. Methods, 6, 343, 10.1038/nmeth.1318 · DOI
  4. Gietz, 2007, Frozen competent yeast cells that can be transformed with high efficiency using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method, Nat. Protoc., 2, 1, 10.1038/nprot.2007.17 · DOI
  5. Hauf, 2000, Simultaneous genomic overexpression of seven glycolytic enzymes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Enzym. Microb. Technol., 26, 688, 10.1016/S0141-0229(00)00160-5 · DOI
  6. Horwitz, 2015, Efficient multiplexed integration of synergistic alleles and metabolic pathways in yeasts via CRISPR-Cas, Cell Systems, 1, 88, 10.1016/j.cels.2015.02.001 · DOI
  7. Jakočiūnas, 2015, Multiplex metabolic pathway engineering using CRISPR/Cas9 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Metab. Eng., 28, 213, 10.1016/j.ymben.2015.01.008 · DOI
  8. Mans, 2015, CRISPR/Cas9: a molecular Swiss army knife for simultaneous introduction of multiple genetic modifications in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, FEMS Yeast Res., 15, 10.1093/femsyr/fov004 · DOI
  9. Ryan, 2014, Selection of chromosomal DNA libraries using a multiplex CRISPR system, Elife., 3, 10.7554/eLife.03703 · DOI
  10. Stovicek, 2015, CRISPR–Cas system enables fast and simple genome editing of industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains, Metab Eng. Commun., 2, 13, 10.1016/j.meteno.2015.03.001 · DOI
  11. Wiedemann, 2008, Codon-optimized bacterial genes improve l-arabinose fermentation in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 74, 2043, 10.1128/AEM.02395-07 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Generoso, W. C., Gottardi, M., Oreb, M., & Boles, E.
Venue
Journal of Microbiological Methods
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-08
Volume
127
Pages
203-205
ISSN
0167-7012
Cited by
165
References
1
Language
en
Funders
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (239395/2012-3)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review