The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanical activation of ultramafic mine waste rock in dry condition for enhanced mineral carbonation
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Grinding to a finer grain size to increase metal recovery would also accelerate mineral dissolution by creating greater surface area.
“Grinding to a finer grain size to increase metal recovery would also accelerate mineral dissolution by creating greater surface area [84-86].”
From Integrated Mineral Carbonation of Ultramafic Mine Deposits—A Review (2018) · cites this paper as [85]
The reactivity of partially-serpentinized olivine is higher than that of pure olivine in a direct aqueous carbonation process, due to large surface area and poorly ordered structures induced by serpentinization.
“Li and Hitch found that the reactivity of partially-serpentinized olivine is higher than that of pure olivine in a direct aqueous carbonation process, due to large surface area and poorly ordered structures induced by serpentinization [84-86].”
From Integrated Mineral Carbonation of Ultramafic Mine Deposits—A Review (2018) · cites this paper as [85]
Lizardite acted as a catalyst by assisting forsterite reaching high levels of activation, generating greater CO2 conversion to carbonate than pure olivine with equal specific milling energy input.
“It was determined that lizardite, a hydrated magnesium silicate also common in ultramafic-hosted mineral deposits, acted as catalyst by assisting forsterite reaching high levels of activation. This condition generated a greater CO2 conversion to carbonate than that of pure olivine with the equal specific milling energy input [112].”
From Integrated Mineral Carbonation of Ultramafic Mine Deposits—A Review (2018) · cites this paper as [112]
Citations
Cites
A review of mineral carbonation technologies to sequester CO 2
Sanna, A., Uibu, M., Caramanna, G., Kuusik, R., & Maroto-Valer, M. M. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c4cs00035h · Cited by 1,258
Wilson, S. A. (2006) · American Mineralogist · doi:10.2138/am.2006.2058 · Cited by 172
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Bobicki, 2015, Mineral carbon storage in pre-treated ultramafic ores, Miner. Eng., 70, 43, 10.1016/j.mineng.2014.08.009 · DOI · Paper page
- Hitch, 2010, Revaluing mine waste rock for carbon capture and storage, Int. J. Min. Reclam. Environ., 24, 64, 10.1080/17480930902843102 · DOI · Paper page
- Hitch, 2012, Economic feasibility and sensitivity analysis of integrating industrial-scale mineral carbonation into mining operations, Miner. Eng., 39, 268, 10.1016/j.mineng.2012.07.007 · DOI · Paper page
- Hövelmann, 2011, Experimental study of the carbonation of partially serpentinized and weathered peridotites, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 75, 6760, 10.1016/j.gca.2011.08.032 · DOI · Paper page
- Li, 2015, Ultra-fine grinding and mechanical activation of mine waste rock using a high-speed stirred mill for mineral carbonation, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 22, 1005, 10.1007/s12613-015-1162-3 · DOI · Paper page
- Li, 2016, Characterization of the microstructure of mechanically-activated olivine using X-ray diffraction pattern analysis, Miner. Eng., 86, 24, 10.1016/j.mineng.2015.11.010 · DOI
- Rigopoulos, 2015, Carbon dioxide storage in olivine basalts: effect of ball milling process, Powder Technol., 273, 220, 10.1016/j.powtec.2014.12.046 · DOI
- Sanna, 2013, Enhancing Mg extraction from lizardite-rich serpentine for CO2 mineral sequestration, Miner. Eng., 49, 135, 10.1016/j.mineng.2013.05.018 · DOI · Paper page
- Zhang, 1997, Enhancement of acid extraction of magnesium and silicon from serpentine by mechanochemical treatment, Hydrometallurgy, 45, 323, 10.1016/S0304-386X(96)00087-4 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mechanical activation of magnesium silicates for mineral carbonation, a review
Li, J., & Hitch, M. (2018) · Minerals Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2018.08.034 · Cited by 143
Self-citationRecent developments and challenges of aqueous mineral carbonation: a review
Veetil, S. P., & Hitch, M. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13762-020-02776-z · Cited by 134
Self-citationIntegrated Mineral Carbonation of Ultramafic Mine Deposits—A Review
Li, J., Hitch, M., Power, I., & Pan, Y. (2018) · Minerals · doi:10.3390/min8040147 · Cited by 114
Self-citationVaughn, J. S., Marple, M. A. T., & Mason, H. E. (2024) · Cement and Concrete Research · doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2023.107413 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, J., & Hitch, M.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Li, Jiajie
- Venue
- Minerals Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-09
- Volume
- 95
- Pages
- 1-4
- ISSN
- 0892-6875 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2410455126
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 3.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Minerals Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- State Scholarship Fund (2008110820)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
- Keywords
- mechanical activation, CO2 mineralization, olivine, serpentine, forsterite, specific surface area, microstructure, microstrain, CO2 sequestration, crystallite size
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review