CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 28Extraction and Separation ProcessesMetal Extraction and BioleachingMagnesium Oxide Properties and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Leaching of natural magnesite ore in succinic acid solutions

Raza, Nadeem, Zafar, Zafar Iqbal, Najam-ul-Haq, Kumar, R.V.·2015·International Journal of Mineral Processing
DOI 10.1016/j.minpro.2015.04.008
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.minpro.2015.04.008

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Magnesite growth occurs via a spiral growth mechanism in artificial brine at temperatures ranging from 80 to 120 °C, pressures between 1 and 2.5 bar, and saturation indices ranging from 20 to 100.

    “Following these considerations, it was demonstrated that magnesite growth occurs via a spiral growth mechanism in artificial brine, at temperatures ranging from 80 to 120 °C, pressures between 1 to 2.5 bar, and saturation indices ranging from 20 to 100.”

    From Mechanisms of Mg carbonates precipitation and implications for CO 2 capture and utilization/storage (2023) · cites this paper as [96]

  • By extrapolating the results, the rate constants calculated for the obtuse and acute growth steps of magnesite are 2.4 × 10-13 and 2.0 × 10-14 cm s-1, respectively, at Ω = 10 and 25 °C, implying that following this kinetic model it would take 1.5 years to precipitate a 10 mm layer of magnesite at room temperature.

    “By extrapolating the results, the rate constants was calculated for the obtuse and acute growth steps of magnesite are 2.4 × 10 -13 and 2.0 × 10 -14 cm s -1 , respectively at Ω = 10 and 25 °C, meaning that following this kinetic model, it would take 1.5 years to precipitate 10 mm layer of magnesite at room temperature.96”

    From Mechanisms of Mg carbonates precipitation and implications for CO 2 capture and utilization/storage (2023) · cites this paper as [96]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kurtbas, 1992, HCl cozeltilerinde manyezitin heterojen reaksiyon kinetigi, Doga, Turk. J., 16, 90

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Raza, N., Zafar, Z. I., Najam-ul-Haq, & Kumar, R. V.
Affiliations
  • Bahauddin Zakariya University (PK)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Raza, Nadeem
ORCID
Venue
International Journal of Mineral Processing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
139
Pages
25-30
ISSN
0301-7516 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.minpro.2015.04.008
OpenAlex
W1976330553
Cited by
28
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2016: 2
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
International Journal of Mineral Processing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Metals and Alloys › Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Metals and Alloys › Metal Extraction and Bioleaching
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications
Keywords
magnesite, succinic acid, acid leaching, magnesium extraction, leaching kinetics, activation energy, particle size effects, reaction temperature, liquid-to-solid ratio, stirring speed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review