Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3Nursing Diagnosis and DocumentationElectronic Health Records SystemsNursing education and management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Minutes That Matter

Weirich, Brian, Martin, LeAnn, Corbin, Allison·2026·Nurse Leader
DOI 10.1016/j.mnl.2026.102763
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mnl.2026.102763

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 3

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Weirich, B., Martin, L., & Corbin, A.
Venue
Nurse Leader
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-08
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
102763
ISSN
1541-4612 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.mnl.2026.102763
OpenAlex
W7160038877
Cited by
1
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
11.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Locations
Nurse Leader (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
Keywords
nursing documentation, documentation workload, clinician burnout, artificial intelligence, dose-response analysis, change management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Minutes That Matter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.mnl.2026.102763
The paper
Weirich, B., Martin, L., & Corbin, A. (2026). Minutes That Matter. Nurse Leader. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mnl.2026.102763

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.