Cited by 61AI in cancer detectionArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Artificial Intelligence-aided diagnosis of breast cancer lymph node metastasis on histologic slides in a digital workflow

Open access
Challa, Bindu, Tahir, Maryam, Hu, Yan, Kellough, David, Lujan, Giovani, Sun, Shaoli, Parwani, Anil V., Li, Zaibo·2023·Modern Pathology

Abstract

Identifying lymph node (LN) metastasis in invasive breast carcinoma can be tedious and time-consuming. We investigated an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm to detect LN metastasis by screening hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) slides in a clinical digital workflow. The study included 2 sentinel LN (SLN) cohorts (a validation cohort with 234 SLNs and a consensus cohort with 102 SLNs) and 1 nonsentinel LN cohort (258 LNs enriched with lobular carcinoma and postneoadjuvant therapy cases). All H&E slides were scanned into whole slide images in a clinical digital workflow, and whole slide images were automatically batch-analyzed using the Visiopharm Integrator System (VIS) metastasis AI algorithm. For the SLN validation cohort, the VIS metastasis AI algorithm detected all 46 metastases, including 19 macrometastases, 26 micrometastases, and 1 with isolated tumor cells with a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 41.5%, positive predictive value of 29.5%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 100%. The false positivity was caused by histiocytes (52.7%), crushed lymphocytes (18.2%), and others (29.1%), which were readily recognized during pathologists' reviews. For the SLN consensus cohort, 3 pathologists examined all VIS AI annotated H&E slides and cytokeratin immunohistochemistry slides with similar average concordance rates (99% for both modalities). However, the average time consumed by pathologists using VIS AI annotated slides was significantly less than using immunohistochemistry slides (0.6 vs 1.0 minutes, P = .0377). For the nonsentinel LN cohort, the AI algorithm detected all 81 metastases, including 23 from lobular carcinoma and 31 from postneoadjuvant chemotherapy cases, with a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 78.5%, positive predictive value of 68.1%, and NPV of 100%. The VIS AI algorithm showed perfect sensitivity and NPV in detecting LN metastasis and less time consumed, suggesting its potential utility as a screening modality in routine clinical digital pathology workflow to improve efficiency.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100216

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Challa and colleagues evaluated the Visiopharm Integrator System metastasis AI algorithm in pathology workflows in a retrospective study at Ohio State University with promising results.

    “Challa and colleagues (47) evaluated the Visiopharm Integrator System metastasis AI algorithm in pathology workflows in a retrospective study at Ohio State University with promising results.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 61

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ertosun MG, Rubin DL. Automated grading of gliomas using deep learning in digital pathology emages: a modular approach with ensemble of convolu- tional neural networks. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2015;2015:1899e1908.

Authors
Challa, B., Tahir, M., Hu, Y., Kellough, D., Lujan, G., Sun, S., Parwani, A. V., & Li, Z.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Li, Zaibo
Venue
Modern Pathology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-08
Volume
36
Issue
8
Pages
100216
ISSN
0893-3952 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4376130051
Cited by
61
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 14
FWCI
5.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Modern Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ohio State University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Keywords
breast cancer, lymph node metastasis, artificial intelligence, sentinel lymph node, whole slide images, micrometastases, isolated tumor cells, cytokeratin immunohistochemistry, lobular carcinoma, histiocytes, false positives
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Hematoxylin, Humans, Lymph Nodes, Lymphatic Metastasis, Carcinoma, Lobular, Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy, Workflow

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review